[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

County board blocks extension of wind, solar reviews  

Credit:  By Gordon Woods | Clinton Journal | Nov 3, 2021 | theclintonjournal.com ~~

CLINTON – Any company applying for a special use permit for a solar or wind energy project will be regulated by the ordinance in effect at the time of the application, state’s attorney Dan Markwell told county board members during the board’s Oct. 26 meeting.

That is the case for a special use permit for any purpose, Markwell said.

Markwell’s comments came as an effort to extend review of the county’s wind and solar energy ordinances was presented during the meeting.

Board chairman Terry Ferguson reported the land use committee had concluded its review of the county’s solar energy ordinance and forwarded it to the Regional Planning Commission (RPC).

“The RPC has started its process,” Ferguson said. “They said they should have it completed at their next meeting.”

The ordinance would next move on to the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA).

The six-month review period set for RPC will extend a few weeks. An application submitted before the review is completed would be governed under the existing ordinance.

“If anyone applies for a special use permit of any kind, solar or otherwise, it’s going to be dictated by the laws or ordinances in effect at the time they submit their application,” Markwell said.

Markwell said if amendments to the ordinance were already “in the process” and the applicants were made aware of this, they would be bound by the amendments.

Buck Carter presented a motion to extend the review of the county’s wind energy ordinance, also taking place during the same period as the solar energy review.

The wind ordinance review, which resulted in the county suspending issuance of permits for the Alta Farms II wind project, prompted Enel Green Energy to sue the county. A judge ruled the county did not have the authority to deny the permits. Most permits for the project had already been issued when the suspension was implemented.

• See the complete story in the Friday, Nov. 5, print edition of the Clinton Journal or now in the Journal E-Edition for subscribers.

Source:  By Gordon Woods | Clinton Journal | Nov 3, 2021 | theclintonjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: