LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farms Ayrshire: Overhill plans knocked back by council 

Credit:  Wind farm proposals set to be rejected over height after developer increased size | By Calam Pengilly, Repurter | Cumnock Chronicle | www.cumnockchronicle.com ~~

An application for 10 wind turbines to be installed near Dalmellington is set to be rejected by planning chiefs over size concerns.

The proposed Over Hill Windfarm was earmarked for a site around 4km south-west of Dalmellington and 8km from New Cumnock.

The site is dominated by poorly drained undulating peatland and is the home of the former Benbain and Chalmerston Pennyvenie opencast coal sites.

The development, proposed by German company, Energiekontor, sought to create 10, 180m high (to blade tip) Nordex N133 turbines with an installed capacity of 48MW. The plans were adjusted from earlier proposals in 2017 that included shorter turbines.

Earlier proposals had been granted consent by the council on May, 7, 2020.

However, after measuring the amount of wind in the area and finding there to be less than expected, the developers said it was necessary to increase the size of their turbines to compensate.

This however, has prompted planning chiefs to advise East Ayrshire Council to now reject the proposals.

A report presented to the council ahead of a committee meeting on Thursday, states: “The proposed development would result in significant adverse impacts on a number of matters, particularly landscape and visual impacts and peat.

“The scale of the turbines now proposed would exert considerable influence on residential visual amenity.”

Nine representations were received from four individuals about the plans. Objections concerned issues of visual impact, with the increased height of the turbines said to make the development overwhelming and unacceptable in terms of residential visual amenity.

Also, objectors raised the cumulative effect of another wind farm on the landscape leading to ‘surrounding effect’.

Source:  Wind farm proposals set to be rejected over height after developer increased size | By Calam Pengilly, Repurter | Cumnock Chronicle | www.cumnockchronicle.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky