[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Government urged to ensure communities are paid for hosting offshore wind farms  

Credit:  Former energy secretaries say it is ‘absolutely right’ coastal and rural communities should be compensated for local negative impacts. | Shropshire Star | www.shropshirestar.com ~~

Coastal and rural communities should be paid for hosting offshore wind farms to prevent a similar backlash to fracking, the Government has been urged.

Former energy secretaries Dame Andrea Leadsom and Amber Rudd have called for compensation for communities where onshore infrastructure such as underground cables, pylons and substations has to be built to connect offshore turbines to the grid.

They also say they support an offshore wind “ring main” where neighbouring farms in the sea work together to reduce the burden of infrastructure on communities.

They make their comments in the foreword of a report by think tank Policy Exchange, which calls for the Government to introduce mandatory “offshore wind wealth funds” for all new offshore wind farms.

It also calls for a package of reforms, which includes moves to improve coordination on new infrastructure that could save £3-£6 billion by 2050, warning that the current rules were likely to increase energy bills.

Funding from the wealth fund should pay for upgrades to community facilities, enhancing local services and improving people’s skills in the area, with a typical one gigawatt (1GW) offshore wind farm providing around £2 million a year to local projects for the first 15 years.

Without action, the report warns that offshore wind farms will increasingly face local backlash, similar to that seen for onshore wind farms and shale gas extraction through controversial fracking.

Local opposition including court challenges could hamper efforts to meet the Government’s ambition to establish 40 gigawatts of offshore wind by 2030, limiting jobs and slowing down emissions cuts, it said.

Despite being out at sea, and therefore having less impact than onshore wind or fracking operations, each offshore farm currently builds its own connection to the onshore network.

This can require significant infrastructure such as substations, in some cases the size of Wembley Stadium, digging up the countryside for laying cables, and new pylons, the report said.

Planned new farms are already causing significant concern in East Anglia and could lead to similar concerns in North Wales, Humberside and the east coast of Scotland as more offshore wind farms are developed, it said.

In the foreword, Dame Andrea and Ms Rudd said: “Local communities are rightly concerned about the sheer amount of infrastructure built by individual offshore wind companies and the Government must act.

“The Government should urgently carry out an audit of all outstanding plans for onshore infrastructure relating to offshore wind farms and consider ways to minimise the damage to precious inland areas.”

“Where new onshore infrastructure is needed, we should compensate local communities through new ‘Offshore Wind Wealth Funds’.

“We already do this for onshore wind farms through ‘Community Benefit Funds’, and we were planning something similar for fracking.

“It’s absolutely right that coastal and rural communities should be compensated for hosting new large-scale infrastructure that provides national benefits but has local negative impacts.”

Ed Birkett, senior research fellow at Policy Exchange, and author of the report, said: “Offshore wind is a huge UK success story. But success brings new challenges.

“Unless the Government gets ahead of this problem, new offshore wind farms will be delayed or even blocked by increasing local resistance.”

Source:  Former energy secretaries say it is ‘absolutely right’ coastal and rural communities should be compensated for local negative impacts. | Shropshire Star | www.shropshirestar.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.