News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Tourist town blows up  

Credit:  Stanley unites in fight against 12-tower wind farm proposal | Helen Kempton | The Mercury | June 12, 2021 | ~~

A Tasmanian town recently voted the state’s top tourism spot is uniting against a wind farm proposal residents say will be a scar on its famous landscape and damage its appeal.

Epuron is preparing a development application for a 12tower wind farm to be built on farmland near historic Highfield House.

Epuron says on its website that assessment work for the proposed Western Plains Wind Farm – located at the tip of the Stanley Peninsula – had been completed and it would submit the final development proposal and environmental management plan to Circular Head Council and the Environment Protection Authority Tasmania in the next few months.

Tasmania’s far North-West has attracted the attention of many wind farm developers.

There is a farm at Woolnorth, one at Studland Bay, another at Granville Harbour and a controversial proposal to build a mega renewable energy park on Robbins Island and nearby Jims Plains.

Once operational, the 12 turbines proposed for Stanley would contribute 50.4 megawatts of energy to Tasmania’s grid.

The owner of The Ship Inn, Kerry Houston, said Stanley’s bid for Top Tourist Town centred on its history, the iconic Nut and vistas.

“The National Wind Farm Commissioner recommends that wind farms not be built within 5km of a township but this project is less than 4km from our charming historical village,” Ms Houston said. “Local vets, nurses, farmers, lawyers and tourism operators are fighting to save Stanley from an industrialisation that would change this iconic Tasmanian landmark forever.

“The famous Nut is 143m high and they are proposing to overshadow it with 12 150mhigh turbines. Locals aren’t against renewable energy or hiding away from industry, and believe industry can work in harmony with tourism.

“But imagine the outcry if they wanted to place 12 turbines on the Neck at Bruny?

“The renewables title can’t be a free pass to pillage Tasmania’s iconic sites. It comes with responsibility to place and to community.”

Stanley attracts more than 100,000 visitors each year and those against the wind farm proposal say it poses a risk to that tourism. There is also concern about how much noise the turbines will generate.

“Many locals believe the Stanley Peninsula should have a scenic protection overlay and will hold a town meeting in July to discuss the Epuron proposal and will invite local councillors, politicians and the developer to hear their concerns,” Ms Houston said.

The company will hold a community drop-in session in Stanley on June 22.

Source:  Stanley unites in fight against 12-tower wind farm proposal | Helen Kempton | The Mercury | June 12, 2021 |

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.