Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Please note that opinion pieces (including letters, editorials, and blogs), reflect the viewpoints of their authors; National Wind Watch does not necessarily agree with them in their entirety or endorse them in any way.
Rural, green wind power has its drawbacks
Credit: Letters | The Wall Street Journal | June 8, 2021 | www.wsj.com ~~
Share:
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Regarding the May 25 letter from the American Clean Power Association’s CEO Heather Zichal : Communities seldom know what they are accepting. As an energy-law attorney in upstate New York, I have reviewed many wind-turbine leases presented to landowners. Every one of them contained a confidentiality clause that would make the CIA proud. Typically the lease bars the landowner from disclosing anything about the lease. These clauses are anticompetitive, intimidating (injunctive relief and attorney fees) and entirely one-sided. They prevent landowners from discussing rents and other lease terms with other landowners, municipal officials and the press, effectively trapping the landowner in a take-it-or-leave-it black box of silence and ignorance.
Ms. Zichal’s unsupported assertion that the exponential growth is attributable to communities’ desire to site these behemoths, which can range up to 650 feet (and sometimes beyond), on their property ignores the corporate welfare of subsidized rates, the investment tax credit and production tax credit from the U.S. Treasury, the states’ tax credits, the real-property tax abatements required by state law, the grants of up to 50% of the construction materials and labor from some states such as New York, state siting laws that override local laws and the lax enforcement of state environmental rules (if any), which together leave little room for anything but acceptance. Lastly, the reputedly steady income from the leases will last only so long as this subsidy bubble doesn’t burst.
Christopher Denton
Elmira, N.Y.
Appeared in the June 9, 2021, print edition.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
![]() (via Stripe) |
![]() (via Paypal) |