[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

When economic growth does nothing for local schools  

Credit:  Why are districts so willing to give hand-outs to international conglomerates? | By Carine Martinez | The Dallas Morning News | May 9, 2021 | www.dallasnews.com ~~

Smithville ISD’s two elementary schools earned “D” ratings from the Texas Education Agency for 2018-19 (the most recent year available). The junior high for the small district east of Austin got a “C.” Though its high school received a very low “B,” it earned no distinctions from the Texas Education Agency.

Yet in March, the Smithville school board told its attorney to begin negotiations to turn down an estimated $10 million of tax revenue in what amounts to a gift to a power company that boasts on its website that it “ranks among the top 10 onshore wind companies in the U.S.”

RWE Renewables America “owns more than 9 gigawatts of renewable energy capacity with another 2.6 GW under development. RWE thus ranks as the number 4 global renewables player and is number 2 in offshore wind capacity.” In its application to reduce the appraised value of its property, the company stated that it intended to request that the job requirement be waived.

So why should this massive international conglomerate get a handout from the tiny Smithville school district? Because it can. Local tax abatement agreements (under Chapter 313 of the Texas Tax Code) allow businesses such as big solar energy developers to seek tax abatement agreements with schools districts, with the implied (or explicit) threat that they can take their jobs and their future revenue elsewhere.

But does Chapter 313, titled the Texas Economic Development Act, really deliver economic development? Or do the taxpayers end up with the tab?

That issue has been studied extensively, and the conclusions are clear. At best, these incentives do not tend to work; at worst, they can be harmful.

Research on the importance of such incentives on a business’s location choice has shown that many other factors come into play, and incentives are rarely at the top of the list. A 2018 study by the Upjohn Institute of the research literature on the effects of state and local incentives, with a focus on “but for” percentages (that is, how many businesses would not have chosen a location “but for” the incentives offered) estimated that at least 75% of businesses that received incentives in the U.S. would have located where they did without them.

Here in Texas, a 2017 study of more than 80 Chapter 313 projects focused on the bargaining behavior between businesses applying for the abatements and the school districts granting them. Based notably on the percentage of a granted abatement, businesses were willing to make supplemental payments to the school districts. On a survey of economic development experts published by the Washington Center for Equitable Growth, the author concluded that only about 15% of businesses that received such deals would have located elsewhere without them.

And too often, school districts waive the job requirements when companies come back to them with lower estimates of the number of workers they’ll employ. It’s hard to understand how Chapter 313 could be described as an economic development tool that brings investments and jobs to Texas, yet allows school districts to simply waive the jobs requirement.

What can Texas lawmakers do? The best thing would be to let Chapter 313 expire, as it’s set to do. If the problem is property taxes that are too high, then we should fix the problem, which exists for every Texan, not try to calm a symptom for select and usually big corporate taxpayers.

Yet if the Legislature renews Chapter 313, some improvements should be made, such as repealing the provision that allows job waivers.

In 2017, the Smithville school district sued the Texas Comptroller’s office over just $50,000 in lost revenue. Its superintendent at the time told the Austin American Statesman, “It’s not much, but that could make a big difference.”

The $10 million in revenue the district is about to give away to RWE Renewables America dwarfs that sum. And in a nutshell, that’s the problem with Chapter 313.

Carine Martinez is director of research and publications for the Texas Public Policy Foundation.

Source:  Why are districts so willing to give hand-outs to international conglomerates? | By Carine Martinez | The Dallas Morning News | May 9, 2021 | www.dallasnews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: