LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]




Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Ørsted says offshore UK windfarms need urgent repairs 

Credit:  Operator says it may need to spend £350m over two years to repair cable damage caused by seabed rocks | Jillian Ambrose | The Guardian | Thu 29 Apr 2021 | www.theguardian.com ~~

The Danish wind power firm Ørsted has warned that up to 10 of its giant offshore windfarms around the UK and Europe will need urgent repairs because their subsea cables have been eroded by rocks on the seabed.

The renewables firm, which is behind plans to build one of the world’s largest offshore windfarms off the coast of Grimsby, told investors it might need to spend up to DKK3bn (£350m) over the next two years to repair the cables.

Ørsted has found that the rocks placed at the base of the wind turbine foundations to prevent the erosion of the seabed were responsible for wearing down the cable protection system which, in a worst case scenario, could cause the cables to fail.

The problem was first discovered earlier this year after its Race Bank offshore windfarm off the Norfolk coast, which can generate enough electricity to power 500,000 homes, suffered an outage due to cable damage caused by the seabed rocks. The windfarm includes 91 turbines standing in ocean depths of between 19ft and 85ft.

Marianne Wiinholt, Ørsted’s chief financial officer, said: “When we investigated the cause we found that more cables were damaged, and that the damage is caused by the fact that the cable protection system … is placed on top of rocks. With movement in the sea, these cable protection systems get damaged.”

The company did not name the other windfarms that may need repairs, but the majority of its European projects are based in the UK. Ørsted’s 12 UK windfarms generate enough electricity to power 3.2m British homes a year, contributing a significant amount of the UK’s renewable electricity.

Ørsted is considering a two-phase approach to the problem. In phase 1, the company plans to stabilise its cable protection systems to prevent further damage, which may include a low-cost plan to “dump more rocks” on top of the cables to keep them in place and prevent the movement that leads to erosion.

In phase 2, the company will begin repairing or replacing cables that are already damaged, which is likely to be more expensive.

John Musk, an analyst at RBC Capital, said the cable damage was “likely to cause concern for investors until the full cost implications are ironed out”, and might also raise concerns over whether other offshore wind developers would face similar issues.

Offshore wind made up 13% of the UK’s total electricity generation last year, surpassing onshore wind for the first time. The government expects offshore wind to play a major role in the UK’s future electricity system, and aims to quadruple the UK’s offshore wind capacity to generate enough electricity to be able to power every home in the UK.

This article was amended on 30 April 2021. Ørsted plans to build a windfarm off the coast of Grimsby, not off the Yorkshire coast at Dogger Bank where a separate group has plans for a windfarm. Also, its Race Bank farm can generate enough electricity to power 500,000 homes, not 3.2m as an earlier version said; 3.2m is the number of British homes for which all 12 of Ørsted’s UK windfarms can generate enough electricity each year, not 4.2m.

Source:  Operator says it may need to spend £350m over two years to repair cable damage caused by seabed rocks | Jillian Ambrose | The Guardian | Thu 29 Apr 2021 | www.theguardian.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Accidents


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky