| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
NJ offshore wind farm to connect to Oyster Creek, B.L. England plants
Credit: Wayne Parry | Associated Press | pressofatlanticcity.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
ATLANTIC CITY – A large offshore wind energy project planned off the coast of New Jersey will connect onshore to two former power plants, and cables will run under two of the state’s most popular beaches, officials said Tuesday.
At a virtual public hearing on the Ocean Wind project planned by Ørsted, the Danish wind energy developer, and PSEG, a New Jersey utility company, officials revealed the project would connect to the electric grid at decommissioned power plants in Ocean and Cape May counties.
The northern connection would be at the former Oyster Creek nuclear power plant in Lacey Township; the southern connection would be at the former B.L. England plant in Upper Township.
Cables running from the wind farm, to be located between 15 and 27 miles off Atlantic City, would come ashore at one of three potential locations in Ocean City: Fifth Street, 13th Street or 35th Street. They would then run under the road along Roosevelt Boulevard out to Upper Township and the former power plant, which closed in 2019.
Cables also would need to cross Island Beach State Park in Ocean County, running under the dunes and beach and existing parking lots, out into Barnegat Bay, coming ashore either directly at the Oyster Creek site in the Forked River section of Lacey, or at either Bay Parkway or Lighthouse Drive in Waretown.
Pilar Patterson, permit manager for Ørsted, said the onshore work in beach areas would be kept to a minimum during the summer.
She said the company had done visualization studies showing it would be difficult for the average person to see the windmill turbines from the shoreline, noting that weather conditions, time of day and other factors all affect visibility.
Some Jersey Shore residents have voiced opposition to the project, based on the possibility of seeing the turbines from the beach.
The project, designed to generate 1,100 megawatts of electricity, enough to power 500,000 homes, would include up to 98 turbines.
The turbines would be illuminated by two types of lighting: aviation lights atop the turbines, which would only activate when a plane is nearby, and navigation lights designed to make the structures visible to boats. The second category of lighting would not be visible from shore. They cannot be seen from farther than 5 nautical miles, Patterson said.
She said the turbines would be spaced far enough apart that recreational vessels and fishing boats could maneuver among them. Ørsted and state and federal regulators said minimizing any impact on recreational and commercial fishing is a top priority in building the project.
Scot Mackey of the Garden State Seafood Association said the fishing community’s input was not incorporated into final plans for the project.
Bob Stern of the New Jersey Coalition for Wind Without Impact, a Long Beach Island group, raised concerns about the blighting of the ocean landscape and possible decreased property values from the turbines and related work. He also said sea life, including the critically endangered North Atlantic right whale, would be further imperiled by the project.
“By the time you exclude from the people who don’t want to see the turbines and the right whales who don’t want to hear the turbines, there’s not much left,” he said.
There are less than 400 right whales estimated to be alive, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Ciro Scalera, an official with the Laborers International Union of North America, said his union supports the project and the clean energy jobs it would bring.
Christina Renna, CEO of the Chamber of Commerce Southern New Jersey said the project will help diversify the southern Jersey economy, which is currently dependent on casinos.Ørsted hopes to have the project running by the end of 2024.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=100336 ]
