[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Decision taken on ‘giant windfarm’ plan after surprise local plan ‘contraventions’ revealed to meeting  

Credit:  By Calum Corral, Senior Reporter | Largs & Millport Weekly News | www.largsandmillportnews.com ~~

A plan to erect a string of 150m high wind turbines between Largs and Skelmorlie has been rejected by council planners – after a meeting heard it breached TEN policies in the local development plan.

Rigghill Windfarm Ltd were looking to build 10 wind turbines with a maximum blade tip height of 149.9m approximately one kilometre south east of Skelmorlie.

But protestors finally won their battle to have the proposal scrapped after a two-hour planning meeting on Monday.

Skelmorlie Community Council chairman Helen Boyle pleaded with councillor to refuse the application.

She said: “The turbines are nearly 500ft in height and due to the low frequency noise and would be a health hazard to our village and surrounding area. The view is beautiful, why spoil it?”

Independent councillor Ian Murdoch, said he felt turbines of this size should be kept away from populated areas.

He added: “The development would be far too close to Skelmorlie.

“Any alteration of the landscape on the Red Road would have a detrimental effect on the local environment, residents, wildlife and the general appearance of an extremely beautiful location.”

Fraser Campbell, of applicants Burcote Wind renewables, said the development had the potential to power ‘half of North Ayrshire’.

He told the meeting: “It is our belief that Rigghill is the right development in the right place and would power 35,000 UK households – roughly half the households in the local authority.

“North Ayrshire Council have declared a climate emergency. Scotland world lead climate legislation for net zero emissions by 2045, and renewable energy will have a significant role to play in meeting any climate change objectives.

“It is the most cost effective renewable energy technology and green electricity generation.”

Melvin Grosvenor, of the UK Independent Noise Working Group, also addressed the meeting and raised concerns.

He added: “The World Health Organisation has published guidance that stated further research is urgently needed into harm which is caused by infrasound from turbines.

“These are fundamentally offshore wind turbines which are certainly not suited to the close proximity to local residents proposed by the applicants.”

North Ayrshire planning chairman Tom Marshall said: “Given that we did all support the local development plan as a full council, I would think that we are duty bound to consider any contraventions to that in this application.”

Burcote argued that there was a precedent set by a turbine development in East Ayrshire at 220m tall.

A planning spokesperson added: “The operation of the development would not enhance, and potentially harm, tourism facilities.

“The proposal does not accord with the objectives of the Clyde Muirshiel Regional Park as an attractive visitor destination.”

Burcote argued that conditions could be implemented to assist with the road movements for construction via Routenburn Road – and said they didn’t believe Clyde Muirshiel would be affected from a tourism perspective.

There were also objections from Skelmorlie, Largs, Fairlie and West Kilbride community councils that the application was ‘contradictory to the local development plan’ – with ten breaches cited.

The decision was taken to refuse the application, although Burcote have a right of appeal to the Scottish Ministers.

Source:  By Calum Corral, Senior Reporter | Largs & Millport Weekly News | www.largsandmillportnews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: