[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Tackling Timbermill  

Credit:  Letter to the Editor | Chowan Herald | www.dailyadvance.com ~~

Wow! A full page of propaganda from APEX promising to give the County ample money to maintain schools, pay for staff and make children love their school experience.

All by letting APEX build a Wind Energy Facility (it is not a farm). A number of people have bought into this deception hook, line and sinker to the point that they refuse to even listen to facts. But for those who are still capable of critical thinking, let’s examine all the financial pros and cons:

Timbermill claims about $1.1M will accrue annually to the county from taxes, lease payments, etc. Although nothing is guaranteed, let’s grant them $1 million annually.

On the adverse side, consider the following:

    • Agricultural Losses due to bat kills resulting in the increase of harmful insects and decrease in crop yields: – $3 million loss
    • Agricultural Losses due to turbines affecting local environmental conditions. : – $0.1 million loss
    • Residential Property Devaluation. (To get an idea, the closest turbine off rt. 17 bypass in Pasquotank County is about one mile from the road.) – $0.4 million loss
    • Tourism Reduction: The 600+ foot turbines will be visible from about 80% of the county – who wants to see that when visiting an historic town?: – $4 million loss
    • Adverse Health Effects: Infrasound (i.e. very low frequency sound), shadow flicker, warning lights, etc. Since not everyone is effected the same way, this is a very rough estimate: – $0.1 million loss
    • Hydrogeological Impacts: drinking water, wells, drainage: – $0.1 million loss
    • Ecological Impacts: disruption of wildlife, loss of habitat, etc. – $0.1 million loss
    • Miscellaneous e.g. agriculture support structure – seed, fertilizer, equipment, support jobs, hunting, etc. – $0.2 million loss

Net Total loss: – $7 million per year

Maybe this isn’t such a good deal!

These estimates are supported by over 100 studies, typically from independent experts as opposed to friendly reports paid for by the wind industry. Links to studies are available on request and on WiseEnergy.org.

Jim Robison

Edenton

Source:  Letter to the Editor | Chowan Herald | www.dailyadvance.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: