LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Council’s proposed wind bylaw requires some changes 

Credit:  The Pictou Advocate | March 10, 2021 | pictouadvocate.com ~~

To the council of the Municipality of Pictou County regarding the proposed wind bylaw:

The power production of the existing wind turbines in Pictou County is more than sufficient to provide all the electricity of its inhabitants. The problem is the intermittency of the wind and the storage of the produced electricity. To achieve power self-sufficiency we should invest in photovoltaic power and in ways to store electricity (battery, pump stations, etc.) and of course, in using less.

By allowing more turbines to be built in the county we do not improve our energy situation one bit, but we will receive all the disadvantages that come with large industrial developments (destruction of forests and wildlife habitat, visual and sound pollution, reduced value of existing properties, etc.).

Industrial wind turbine developments need a lot of cleared space around them to allow the wind to be as clean as possible. To cut down thousands of trees, which are the best carbon sequestering “machines” ever invented, in order to build a carbon-free energy future does not make much sense to me. If we do need more wind energy, the turbines should be built where the environment has already been disturbed and where you are close to the consumers like the industrial parks around Halifax, landfills, abandoned industrial sites, etc.

In respect to the proposed amendment, I would suggest the following:

— only the category of the micro turbines up to 10 kW and a tower height of 20 m (65 feet) will be allowed for residences which are off-grid or feed into the Emera grid. Distances and noise levels to be determined after an extensive public consultation and input.

— the misleading category of “small” turbines up to 50 kW and the industrial scale turbines over 50 kW should be discontinued altogether because they do not provide any benefit to the county and its people.

— any further decisions in that matter can only be taken after meaningful consultation and participation of the people.

Volker Klum

Merigomish

Source:  The Pictou Advocate | March 10, 2021 | pictouadvocate.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky