[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Biden accused of playing politics on Vineyard Wind 

Credit:  Bruce Mohl | CommonWealth Magazine | Mar 3, 2021 | commonwealthmagazine.org ~~

When the Trump administration dragged its feet on the environmental permitting of Vineyard Wind, wind energy proponents in Massachusetts and across the country cried foul, claiming politics was driving the process.

But now that the Biden administration is in office, the same claim is surfacing as the president quickly moves in the opposite direction.

The Responsible Offshore Development Alliance, which advocates for the US fishing industry, on Wednesday released comments it sent to Amanda Lefton, the new head of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, questioning how her agency could simply revive a regulatory process that had been terminated by the same agency (which was then under Trump’s oversight) in December.

“It would appear that fishing communities are the only ones screaming into a void while public resources are sold to the highest bidder, as BOEM has reversed its decision to terminate a project after receiving a single letter from Vineyard Wind,” the alliance said in a statement.

Vineyard Wind has gone through a lengthy review process, in part because it’s the first major offshore wind farm to go through the process. The company submitted a construction and operations plan, or COP, to the federal government in December 2017. A year later the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management issued a draft environmental impact statement on the project, which was pulled back after the agency decided it couldn’t review the project in isolation from a host of other wind farm projects being proposed up and down the coast.

In June 2020, the bureau issued a supplemental environmental impact statement, but the statement was never finalized. On December 1, after the election where Trump defeated Biden, Vineyard Wind withdrew its COP to investigate whether it could incorporate a bigger wind turbine generator into the final design.

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management responded on December 16 saying it was terminating work on the final environmental impact statement, a decision that was reversed by Lefton on February 3. Lefton’s decision was made after the agency received a letter on January 22 from Vineyard Wind indicating its COP didn’t need to be tweaked to accommodate the larger wind turbine generator and the federal review could continue.

“Offshore wind has the potential to help our nation combat climate change, improve resilience through reliable power, and spur economic development to create good-paying jobs,” Lefton said in early February. “BOEM is committed to conducting a robust and timely review of the proposed project.”

A notice published in the Federal Register on Wednesday indicated the reversal occurred because, essentially, that’s what Vineyard Wind wanted.

“Because Vineyard Wind has indicated that its proposed COP is a ‘decision pending before BOEM,’ BOEM is resuming its review,” said the Federal Register notice, which was signed by William Brown, chief environmental officer of the Bureau of Energy Management.

The Responsible Offshore Development Alliance said the federal government’s zig-zag approach to regulating offshore wind is a disaster.

“BOEM’s duty as a federal agency is to provide a transparent, structured, legal, and public process for making decisions about public lands and resources that affect all Americans—not to allow one tentacle to wag the octopus,” the alliance said, urging the federal agency to hold public hearings explaining how it could revive a project that was terminated just months ago.

“Unlike offshore wind advocates who lack an intricate understanding of our marine ecosystems, the late stages of the environmental review projects do not leave many commercial fishing communities with optimism, excitement, or hope for their existence,” the alliance said in a statement. “The process has been one-sided, without leadership, and riddled with lost opportunities for co-planning and mitigation.”

Source:  Bruce Mohl | CommonWealth Magazine | Mar 3, 2021 | commonwealthmagazine.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky