LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Loup talks proposed bill on renewable energy standard 

Credit:  Molly Hunter | The Columbus Telegram | February 24, 2021 | columbustelegram.com ~~

Local and statewide power districts are keeping an eye on a number of bills during the Nebraska legislative session, one of which could profoundly change the way the state’s power system is run.

Nebraska Sen. John McCollister (R, District 20) proposed Legislative Bill (LB) 266 at the beginning of the ongoing legislative session. LB266 would create a renewable energy standard to encourage the development and use of renewable electric power generation, with a goal of reaching net-zero carbon emissions in Nebraska by 2050.

The Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD), Loup and the Nebraska Power Association – a voluntary organization with members from throughout the state, including Loup – oppose the bill for a few reasons, but the main one is the belief that it would erode the local control of power districts in Nebraska.

“Nebraska Public Power District is in opposition to the bill as we oppose any type of mandates. We have a duly elected board that is in the best position to make decisions and is uniquely qualified to make determination of future generation needs, rather than by a mandate,” NPPD Corporate Media and Media Services Supervisor Mark Becker wrote in a Tuesday email to the Telegram.

Loup Power President/CEO Neal Suess said public support of renewables already has power districts moving toward zero-carbon generation methods anyway.

“We’re all locally-controlled and we like the local control part of it, where the people in our area can tell us, ‘This is what we want, this is how we want to do it,’ through the election of our board members,” Suess said. “Our big thing is let us do it locally. We’re getting there. All of the big generating utilities in the state have set goals to get there.”

Nebraska also doesn’t have an existing group that is well-suited to set or enforce statewide renewable energy standards, Suess said.

A number of states already have renewable energy standards, Suess said, but in most of them, a statewide utility board sets and enforces them.

In his experience, Suess said, those utility boards largely regulate investor-owned utilities, not public power utilities.

Nebraska’s power suppliers are 100% publicly owned, though.

Private companies in Nebraska work with public power districts – Bluestem is an example; the company worked with Loup to set up the Creston Ridge wind farms. But Loup remains the supplier and the entity that interacts with the customer.

Nebraska has a power review board, but Suess said it mostly oversees disputes between power entities. Therefore, it’s unclear who would set and enforce statewide renewable energy standards.

Importantly, the bill does come with a caveat.

“However, the act will not apply if the board of directors of a public power supplier declares that compliance of the act will negatively affect reliability,” Loup Power Vice President of Corporate Services Todd Duren said at a Tuesday morning meeting of the Loup Power Board of Directors.

And relying solely on zero-carbon generation methods comes with those kinds of drawbacks.

“Wind and solar are probably the two most likely resources you would use to reach carbon-free goals,” Suess said.

But the wind doesn’t always blow and the sun doesn’t always shine. Even hydroelectric facilities can be brought to a standstill by ice, and nuclear power plants face challenges all their own.

Until long-term battery storage options are created – and those are a long way off – it will be necessary to have generation types that can be controlled more readily, like coal and natural gas, for the times when wind, solar and water power cannot meet demand.

“If you don’t have wind and you’re relying on it, the reliability is going to be affected. Same with solar,” Suess said.

Suess said a diverse mix of power generation sources – including a combination of carbon and non-carbon methods – helps with reliability, something customers value very highly.

Source:  Molly Hunter | The Columbus Telegram | February 24, 2021 | columbustelegram.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky