[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Eagle kills 

Credit:  The Mercury | February 22, 2021 | ~~

Eagles and wind turbines are a deadly mix, as Jane Shoobridge-Malecky rightly points out in Talking Point (Mercury, February 17). Currently, the siting of turbines relies on a 30-year-old regulation that was drafted in the Regional Forest Agreement, and which was intended to limit forestry activity within a kilometre radius of an eagle’s nest.

There is no valid comparison of a ground-level forestry operation and a 240m tower, with 100 tonnes of metal spinning at 300km/h, and the accompanying roar. We need to implement world’s best practice as Tasmania is carried along on the current energy boom.

We should not sacrifice our flora and fauna for the rapacious “quick buck”.

An internationally renowned biologist from South Africa, Megan Murgatroyd, headed a seven year research project using eagles fitted with GPS trackers. She has just published “A Predictive Model For Improving Placement of Wind Turbines to Minimise Collision Risk Potential For a Large Soaring Raptor”.

The title says it all, and it is being used to develop wind farms in South Africa. Dr Murgatroyd maintains that using her modelling allows for better and cheaper turbine placement. In its absence, her data shows that a 3.7km radius is the bare minimum area required for the protection of nests.

The precautionary principle (totally ignored here in Tasmania) requires a 5.2 km buffer. Is anyone from the Environment Protection Authority familiar with her work?

Greg Pullen


Source:  The Mercury | February 22, 2021 |

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky