LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Lowther Hills wind farm project rejected by government 

Credit:  BBC News | January 11, 2021 | www.bbc.co.uk ~~

A wind farm project described as “visually dominant and incongruous” by a council has been rejected by the Scottish government.

Developers scaled back the Lowther Hills scheme near Wanlockhead from 42 to 30 turbines.

However, Dumfries and Galloway Council still opposed the proposals which were taken to a public inquiry.

Ministers have now concluded their impact on the landscape would be “unacceptable” and refused the plans.

A public inquiry was held into the project in late 2019 to look at whether it should proceed.

Original developer Buccleuch sold its interest in the scheme to Forsa Energy prior to that.

Forsa’s renewable energy portfolio was, in turn, acquired by BayWa r.e. which was taking the project forward.

The Scottish government has now issued its verdict on the plans which it said should not go ahead.

Ministers agreed that the scheme could help meet renewable energy targets but that did not outweigh its impact on the area.

They concluded it would have “significant adverse landscape and visual impacts” as well as adversely affecting the historic setting of Wanlockhead.

The decision has been welcomed by MP David Mundell who represents Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale.

He said it was “clearly the right decision” and reflected the views held in the area.

His son, Oliver Mundell, who is the MSP for Dumfriesshire said the scheme would have been a “blot on the landscape” and risked damaging ecology and wildlife in the area.

Source:  BBC News | January 11, 2021 | www.bbc.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky