[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wainscott residents file petition to incorporate as a village  

Opposition to the off-shore Orsted wind farm cable proposed to run under a town-owned Wainscott beach is seen as a motivating force for incorporation.

Credit:  By Vera Chinese | Newsday | January 6, 2021 | www.newsday.com ~~

A group of Wainscott residents has filed a petition to incorporate the hamlet as a village, a move they say will bring greater local control over development but critics contend would create an unnecessary layer of bureaucracy.

The Citizens for the Preservation of Wainscott submitted a petition signed by more than 200 residents, or nearly one-third of registered voters, to East Hampton Town Supervisor Peter Van Scoyoc on Dec. 30.

Under state law, Van Scoyoc can accept or reject the petition and, if accepted, then schedule a vote on creating the 4.4-square mile village. The petition needs to be signed by 20% of voters to be valid. Van Scoyoc could not be reached for comment.

“Wainscott is a beautiful community, and the passion to protect and preserve it is just another reason why it is so special,” Gouri Edlich, the group’s chairwoman said in a news release. “We call on Supervisor Van Scoyoc to call the election as soon as possible.”

If approved by voters, Wainscott would be the first Long Island village created since Mastic Beach incorporated in 2010. Mastic Beach dissolved in 2017 amid a projected tax spike, political infighting and federal discrimination lawsuits. Residents in East Quogue voted against incorporation in 2019.

Opposition to the off-shore Orsted wind farm cable proposed to run under a town-owned Wainscott beach is seen as a motivating force for incorporation.

East Hampton Town last month said it had reached a tentative agreement with Orsted to land the cable at Beach Lane in exchange for $28.9 million in community benefits. The group said incorporation could prevent that from happening.

But a group of opposing residents said during a recent virtual interview with Newsday that the village would likely face a legal battle from the wind farm developer, that the new village boundaries would exclude some residents from using the town beach and it would be difficult to find residents to sit on land use review boards.

“This is a private group of individuals who are very well funded, very wealthy,” said Doreen Niggles of Wainscott. “And they do not have the interests of the residents of Wainscott at heart. They have their private interests at heart.”

Citizens for the Preservation of Wainscott has hired lawyers with the Mineola-based firm Bee Ready Fishbein Hatter & Donovan, two consulting firms and a public relations firm to help with its cause. It has not publicly disclosed all its supporters.

The group projects a $838,628 annual budget with residents paying a median $340 more in taxes per year, according to a presentation provided by the group. The budget calls for spending approximately $130,000 on expected legal fees, a number the opposing residents believe will be much higher.

The proposed budget would include a village board, planning, zoning and ordinance departments, beach management, employee benefits and other expenses. It would contract with the town for services, such as police and highway maintenance.

“The strong response to the petition sends a clear message that the people of Wainscott support creation of a new village,” Edlich said.

Source:  By Vera Chinese | Newsday | January 6, 2021 | www.newsday.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: