[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

County updates wind, solar permit schedules  

Credit:  By Jerry Guenther | Norfolk Daily News | December 28, 2020 | norfolkdailynews.com ~~

MADISON – Trying to set a fee for solar and wind farms that is fair to businesses and also covers the county expenses for employee labor to regulate them can be tricky.

Madison County has been working on new fees for months, seeking input from other counties, solar and wind companies and a national trade association to update its old fees that were established more than 10 years ago.

The Madison County Board of Commissioners voted 3-0 on Monday to approve a set of fees as follows: $2,500 for a conditional-use permit for a wind farm, $300 per turbine; and $130 for a solar conditional-use permit – which is the same as a feedlot – and $300 per construction or building permit.

Heather McWhorter, Madison and Pierce counties zoning director, said Antelope, Knox, Kimball, Hamilton, Cass and Merrick counties responded to the request.

The fees ranged from $10,000 for a wind conditional-use permit and $500 per tower in Antelope County to $350 for a wind conditional-use permit and $1,000 per tower in Kimball County. Most solar fees were the regular conditional-use permit (generally around $100) to a high of $300 for the conditional-use permit.

In October, the Madison County Joint Planning Commission voted 6-3 to recommend the fees that were approved, although it suggested charging $3,000 for a wind conditional-use permit instead of $2,500. The joint planning commission was considering that the permits can be controversial and require a lot of time.

McWhorter said she agrees with the joint planning recommendations generally, including that the solar permit doesn’t require near as much time. For one thing, the solar farm is located in one area while wind farms have turbines in many locations.

Troy Uhlir, county board chairman, asked if the county finds out that it is taking more time or less time for solar or wind, could it adjust the fees?

“Absolutely, because those fees are set by the board,” McWhorter said.

Ron Schmidt, county board chairman, asked if based on the $300 fee per turbine fee, would the county get its costs covered?

McWhorter said yes. The individual tower requires McWhorter and an inspector to go out to each site, which will be about two visits and paperwork.

The conditional-use permit is just an overall plan that the company provides, along with research and other information. That mostly requires McWhorter to look it over and verify it, McWhorter said.

Then the conditional-use permit also requires multiple phone calls ahead of the public hearings for the joint planning commission and county board when the project is considered, she said.

“We just want to make sure it covers time and expense,” she said.

Schmidt said he agrees. The county wants to make sure it isn’t making money off the permits but is covering time and expenses.

Commissioner Christian Ohl said he appreciates all the input that the county received, including the joint planning commission and a representative of a wind farm.

Uhlir said if the county gets a big influx of wind farms, it can always hire an additional worker and raise fees if needed.

Madison County has not had a commercial wind farm or solar farm, although there have been permits issues for personal-use wind and solar operations.

A few companies have constructed towers to check wind speeds and directions to see if a wind farm would be feasible. Data is still being gathered on wind speeds from two of the latest ventures.

Source:  By Jerry Guenther | Norfolk Daily News | December 28, 2020 | norfolkdailynews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.