[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

County reaches settlement in lawsuit; Wind developer plans to build solar park instead 

Credit:  Nick Hedrick | Journal Review | Tuesday, July 28, 2020 | www.journalreview.com ~~

Montgomery County has reached a settlement with Sugar Creek Wind LLC in a federal lawsuit involving allegations that the county tried to kill a wind farm project years after agreements were signed with the developers.

In an agreement the Board of Commissioners approved Monday, the case will be dismissed and the company will pay the county $15,000 “as partial reimbursement” for attorneys’ fees.

“The commissioners fought long and hard to defend the interests of citizens who overwhelmingly opposed wind energy in Montgomery County,” the board said in a written statement released after the vote was taken.

“With this settlement, the commissioners can now focus their time, attention and resources to projects and initiatives which will create jobs, improve infrastructure and help make Montgomery County a better place to live and work.”

Sugar Creek Wind filed suit Dec. 13 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District in Indianapolis, accusing the county and the Board of Commissioners of violating agreements signed in 2013 to develop an approximately 250-megawatt wind farm in Madison and Sugar Creek townships after the “political stance” on the project changed.

Developers accused the county of “fast-tracking” a zoning code and passing other ordinances they said made it impossible to obtain a building permit. In response, the county claimed it had evidence the company actively concealed work on the wind farm, citing the observation of construction work and photos of the site on the project’s Web page.

By settling the case, the county can “move forward with our day-to-day stuff that we need to be working on instead of working on this day and night for months and months,” said Jim Fulwider, president of the Board of Commissioners.

Commissioner John Frey said the board “acted as the overwhelming majority of the people that participated in the comprehensive plan had directed us to do, to stop industrial wind farms in Montgomery County.”

“We listened and delivered on what the citizens wanted,” Frey added.

County attorney Dan Taylor called the settlement a “very favorable resolution” of the case.

One of the attorneys representing Sugar Creek Wind in the case, Offer Korin, did not immediately return an e-mail seeking comment.

After dropping the wind farm project, the company now plans to build a solar park in the county, the commissioners said in their statement. Such interest from developers led the county to pass new zoning regulations for solar energy systems.

“We welcome such development, and we are aware of other energy companies that have projects planned in Montgomery County,” the commissioners said. “These projects will help landowners generate revenue without the adverse impacts associated with wind energy projects.”

The company has yet to announce the project. Under the settlement, the county agrees to “act in good faith” in connection with the solar park’s development and “not to single-out Sugar Creek for disparate negative treatment” due to the wind energy dispute.

Source:  Nick Hedrick | Journal Review | Tuesday, July 28, 2020 | www.journalreview.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon