LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

S.D. regulators deal with rural opponents’ sound issues at two wind farms 

Credit:  By Bob Mercer | KELO | Jul 8, 2020 | www.keloland.com ~~

A rancher agreed Wednesday he would cooperate with a wind-project developer on sound testing at his property in Charles Mix County.

Sherman Fuerniss told the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission that he let Prevailing Wind Park know that cattle roaming around his house could damage the testing equipment.

“This is what we live with every day. We have livestock around,” Fuerniss said. He suggested using three corral panels to form a protective triangle around the equipment.

Commissioner Chris Nelson said Fuerniss’ proposal was a good solution. The developer will test at four of the residences affected by the project.

The commission agreed the developer didn’t have to test at the home of Gregg and Marcia Hubner because the Hubners wouldn’t allow it.

The commission also settled a dispute between Amber Christenson of rural Strandburg and the developer of Crowned Ridge Wind project.

The company has installed sound-reducing equipment on 15 turbines that the commission previously didn’t allow to operate.

A company official said the equipment has been added to about 15 other turbines and said all 87 would have the equipment by a September 15 deadline the commission had set.

The commission agreed that 16 turbines – the 15 that received the equipment plus another – could be put into service.

Commissioner Nelson cautioned the company that the commission could take action if the company didn’t meet the deadline.

Source:  By Bob Mercer | KELO | Jul 8, 2020 | www.keloland.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon