Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Mercury Energy warned after breaching consents at Turitea wind farm construction site
Credit: Wind farm consent breaches | Jono Galuszka | Stuff | Jun 19 2020 | www.stuff.co.nz ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Mercury Energy says it is disappointed in itself after it received two warnings about breaching resource consent at the construction of a new wind farm in Manawatū.
Horizons Regional Council records, presented to its environment committee in June, show Mercury was given two infringement notices for “discharge of sediment” and “unauthorised land disturbance”.
Horizons regulatory manager Greg Bevin said the breaches were found when council staff went to the Turitea wind farm construction site in January.
Mercury started building a new 60-turbine farm on the hills to the east of Palmerston North in November.
When finished, the $450 million project will be New Zealand’s biggest wind farm.
The notices were given after work took place in an area before proper environmental controls were in place and some controls were removed before proper sign-off was given, Bevin said.
Infringement notices are a way for enforcement officers to note breaches of resource consents and are often used for minor issues.
Major breaches can result in charges being laid in court.
Mercury project director Dennis Radich said the company was disappointed it didn’t reach the high standards it held itself to for protecting the environment.
“In this case we didn’t get it right.”
Although there was no damage to the environment as a result of the breaches, action had been taken to ensure the same thing did not happen again, he said.
The wind farm was a large and complex project, and Mercury was continuing to work with contractors to keep in line with consents and other commitments.
Radich also thanked Horizons for the attention its staff were giving to the site.
“The observation and subsequent notices in January, while disappointing to us, reflect the robust process administered by the council.”
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: