LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Rocky Forge site is close to the worst 

Credit:  The Roanoke Times | www.roanoke.com ~~

It was extremely disappointing to read the Feb. 10 commentary by Dan Crawford, chair of the Sierra Club Roanoke Group titled “Rocky Forge site is close to perfect.” Similar to a commentary by Christopher West in the January 21 paper, Mr. Crawford appears to have drunk the Kool-Aid being served by Apex Clean Energy, the company responsible for the proposed Rocky Forge Wind project.

When Mr. Crawford writes that “The Rocky Forge site is as close to perfect as we can expect,” he either has not read, or is choosing to ignore, the “Wind Siting Advisory” of the national Sierra Club (https://www.sierraclub.org/policy/energy/wind-siting-advisory). In part, that advisory states:

“The Sierra Club opposes development in protected areas such as national and state parks, national monuments, wilderness areas, wildlife refuges, designated roadless areas, critical habitat and designated habitat recovery areas for wildlife, and areas of cultural significance, sacred lands, and other areas that have special scenic, natural or environmental value. In these areas, it is inappropriate to build wind turbines, roads, transmission lines, or any other structure related to wind development.”

Does Mr. Crawford know, or is he choosing to ignore, that North Mountain, the site for Rocky Forge is located in the Buffalo Creek – Purgatory Mountain Wildlife Corridor? Does Mr. Crawford know, or is he choosing to ignore, that the Botetourt Comprehensive Plan states:

“Preserving scenic views and vistas is particularly important for Botetourt County. The County’s scenery is critical to the rural character and is one of its most distinguishing features.”

Does Mr. Crawford know, or is he choosing to ignore, that the proposed turbines will be visible from the Blue Ridge Parkway? Does Mr. Crawford know, or is he choosing to ignore, that the Upper James River (which flows at the base of North Mountain) is a designated Virginia Scenic River?

The list goes on of information that Mr. Crawford is either ignorant of, or is choosing to ignore, on why the Rocky Forge site is as close to the worst site as possible for such an industrial development project.

DIANNE DEMAY

LEXINGTON

Source:  The Roanoke Times | www.roanoke.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky