[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Moray Council maintains wind farm objection to scaled-back turbine plans  

Credit:  By David Mackay | The Press and Journal | February 26, 2020 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

Moray Council has agreed to object to proposals to build more than 20 wind turbines on Speyside amid concerns about the impact on views – despite developers offering to scale back the development.

A subsidiary of Fred Olsen Renewables initially submitted plans for 29 towers as part of its Rothes III project.

However, the firm has now drawn up plans for a “fall back option” of 23 turbines with most being reduced in height by about 165ft.

Yesterday the council’s planning committee debated the alternative plan, which has been submitted directly to the Scottish Government, after objecting to original blueprint.

Legal officers stressed the firm still intended to try and secure approval for the initial 29-turbine vision but had developed the scaled-back plans, for a site north of Archiestown and west of Rothes, as an alternative.

Forres councillor Aaron McLean said: “It looks like the developer has just lopped 50metres off the top of the turbines. It doesn’t look as though they have tried to integrate them any more with the landscape.”

Forres councillor George Alexander said: “If all these developments get approved then the view south of Aberlour from the A95 is going to change – the Scottish Government reporter needs to seriously look at this.

“It’s going to change what was the Spey Valley into the Ring of Steel Valley.”

The Rothes III plans will be decided following a public inquiry.

Source:  By David Mackay | The Press and Journal | February 26, 2020 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: