[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind farm says massive new rival could cost it “hundreds of millions” in lost energy  

Credit:  Existing West Coast One wind farm wants recent approval for upwind Boulders project to be reviewed, because it will “reduce its access to the wind” | By John Yeld | GroundUp | 18 February 2020 | www.groundup.org.za ~~

An existing wind farm is crying foul after the government last month gave the conditional go-ahead for a massive new wind farm project on an adjoining property on the West Coast Peninsula near Vredenburg.

The West Coast One wind farm, that has been operating since 2015, says the huge turbines of the recently approved Boulders Wind Energy Facility will be situated immediately upwind of its own slightly smaller turbines and will deplete its access to the wind resource because of the physical phenomenon of “wake effect”.

The wake effect is the term for changes in wind speed caused by the mutual interaction of wind turbines sited close to each other. Wake losses are energy production losses caused by a wind energy deficit downstream of wind turbine rotors. (See box at end for fuller explanation.)

West Coast One has now formally appealed the recent environmental authorisation for Boulders by the national Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries (DEFF). Its 72-page appeal, prepared by a prominent Cape Town law firm that specialises in environmental issues, is one of a number of substantial appeals against the approval for Boulders that was issued on 20 January.

In its appeal, West Coast One argues that the presence of its giant new neighbour will cause wake effects that will negatively impact its own energy output, and hence reduce its revenue and economic viability and sustainability, as well as the share of this revenue that is paid to local community shareholders and that trickles down into the local economy.

It has submitted an independent engineering report to show that the wake effects of the turbines at the proposed new wind farm will cause annual energy production losses from its own turbines of between 1.5 and 2.5%, which it terms “a real and valid concern”.

Because it has signed a 20-year supply contract with Eskom, West Coast One says power losses caused by Boulders will represent “significant” revenue losses for them of between R7 million and R11 million a year based on the current tariff – “and potentially as much as hundreds of millions for the remainder of the Power Purchase Agreement, based on estimated operational data”.

If the impact from the Boulders wind farm is to be completely nullified, only eight of its proposed 45 turbines can be kept, West Coast One says in its appeal.

It has not demanded such a radical reduction in the new rival facility, but it wants appropriate compensation if the new wind farm is to become operational.

This, it says, can be authorised by DEFF minister Barbara Creecy, and must be based on a detailed “Forecast Energy Yield Report” by an independent specialist that identifies the potential energy loss expected at West Coast One caused by the wake effects of Boulders.

A tale of two wind farms

The two wind farm facilities will be very close neighbours, less than one kilometre apart on the high ground of West Coast Peninsula.

The Boulders wind energy facility has been designed with 45 huge turbines, each with a rotor diameter of up to 103 metres and a maximum hub (tower) height of 120 metres, that can collectively add up to 140 megawatts of much-needed renewable power to the fickle national grid.

West Coast One, operated by Aurora Wind Power, has 47 slightly smaller turbines (rotor diameter of 90metres and a hub height of 80 metres) that can produce 94MW.

Proposed in 2007 in partnership with Investec and later taken up by ENGIE (formerly GDF SUEZ of France) and local investors, this is a close to R2-billion project approved in 2012 as part of the government’s Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Procurement (REIPPP) programme.

Commercial operations started on schedule in June 2015.

One of the investors in West Coast One is a community trust, and the project spends a percentage of its revenue on so-called SED (socio-economic development) projects within the local community.

After two previous wind farm proposals for neighbouring properties never came to fruition, the Boulders wind farm project was initiated by a German-owned developer, Vredenburg Windfarm, in 2018.

Last month, after a lengthy, tense and complicated environmental impact assessment (EIA) process, DEFF issued a formal Environmental Authorisation for Boulders – a key step in the approval process for the new wind farm, although authorisation was conditional on several design changes being implemented.

A 20-day appeal process kicked in on 20 January, and objectors had until 10 February to submit any appeals that would be adjudicated by Creecy.

West Coast One’s appeal is mainly, but not exclusively, based on the argument that the projected energy loss caused by the impact of the proposed Boulders project will have adverse consequences for the socio-economic benefits flowing from West Coast One. Such consequences, it argues, should have been fully investigated during the environmental impact assessment (EIA) process that formed the basis for the environmental authorisation – but weren’t.

It says this omission is contrary to the principles and provisions of the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA), under which EIA regulations are promulgated, and makes the authorisation reviewable.

It points out that DEFF has set a precedent on three previous occasions by requesting wind farm developers elsewhere to appoint an independent party to compile a wake effect report, to quantify the impact on other wind energy facilities.

“The Minister [Creecy] is requested to remit the [approval] decision back to the Department for reconsideration based on the Applicant [Boulders] first supplementing the EIA process with the relevant and necessary information to address the impacts as motivated in this appeal.”

In the appeal process, Boulders will have an opportunity to respond before 2 March to all the appeal comments. DEFF will then add its own comments, and submit a comprehensive summary with a recommendation to Creecy for a final decision. (We will report the Boulders response after it is filed.)

Source:  Existing West Coast One wind farm wants recent approval for upwind Boulders project to be reviewed, because it will “reduce its access to the wind” | By John Yeld | GroundUp | 18 February 2020 | www.groundup.org.za

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:

Tag: Complaints


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: