[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Enforcing the laws?  

Credit:  Yankton Daily Press & Dakotan | www.yankton.net ~~

I’ve heard the budget is tight in South Dakota – except for money for industrial wind farms. Recently, four of them received another $13 million in sales tax dollars they won’t have to pay, but the taxpayers of South Dakota will.

South Dakota state government has been rated among the most corrupt state governments in the nation by the NGO Coalition for Integrity (2018) and the State Integrity Study (2015). The main reason for their poor ranking is no oversight. In the last month, five wind projects received about $18 million in tax breaks from Gov. Noem and the Board of Economic Development. That’s $18 million for roughly 40 full -time jobs; that’s $450,000 per job created.

If you read Bob Mercer’s “SD Board OKs Millions In Refunds To Wind Farms” article January 15, it says: “A related law requires the board to consider whether the project would have happened in South Dakota without the incentive.” Then read on: “The board discussed the loans and reinvestment payments behind closed doors Wednesday, then moved in open session to approve them without discussion.”

These five projects already exist, are approved or under construction. Did the board follow the law?

Recently, the PUC didn’t even enforce their own conditions they placed on Crowned Ridge. There is no oversight.

The budget is tight in South Dakota unless you’re a wind developer or the governor’s daughter.

Gregg Hubner, Avon

Source:  Yankton Daily Press & Dakotan | www.yankton.net

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: