Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Proposed Farmersville wind law heads for county Planning Board review
Credit: By Rick Miller | Olean Times Herald | January 21, 2020 | www.oleantimesherald.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
FARMERSVILLE – The Farmersville Town Board reviewed an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) on a new proposed wind law Monday.
Prepared by Supervisor Francis “Pete” Lounsbury, the Town Board reviewed each answer on the repeal of the 2019 wind law and introduction earlier this month of a more restrictive and protective law.
It is the first step in the environmental review of the proposed wind law, which now goes before the Cattaraugus County Planning Board for review and recommendation.
Some residents still have questions about the law, said Town Clerk Bridget Holmes. There are questions about the speed at which the local law seems to be progressing.
The local law was introduced at an emergency meeting Jan. 6, and a public hearing was held a week later.
It calls for a 3,000-foot setback of turbines from property lines instead of 1,200 feet, a 455-foot height tip limit instead of 600 feet and a lower noise level than the wind law passed last year by the pro-wind Town Board.
Another provision includes a requirement that a developer address any loss of property value to property owners within two miles of a wind turbine.
After the November election, the 3-2 anti-wind majority voided the 2019 town law on the same day Famersville United filed suit demanding it be overturned.
Lounsbury said the proposed Wind Facilities Law would avoid the negative impacts of the previous law.
“Is this a precursor to a wind law?” asked Councilman Richard Westfall.
The EAF is not addressing any particular project, but whether the proposed law will have an impact on the environment, Lounsbury said.
“It’s not new” said Deputy Supervisor Mark Heberling. “We’ve been going through this for two years.”
A Buffalo environmental attorney, Alicia Rood, who is serving as a special counsel to Town Attorney Eric Firkel, attended the meeting to answer questions.
A question was also raised about the impact on an agricultural district the local law. Rood said she would look into that.
Lounsbury said a second local law introduced Jan. 6 to protect local water resources, will not be acted on further by the Town Board due to a number of issues brought out at the public hearing last week.
An attorney for HodgsonRuss, which represents Invenergy in the proposed Alle-Catt Wind Farm, asked why the proposed local law was pulled?
“We listened to what the residents had to say,” replied Councilman Donna Vickman, who noted water was the deciding factor in the proposed landfill that divided the town years ago. “We decided it isn’t the right law to pass.”
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
(via Paypal) |
(via Stripe) |
Share: