[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

“Untold damage” to Suffolk coast if windfarms approved, says council  

Credit:  Scottish Power Renewables will do "untold damage" to Suffolk coast, says council | Jason Noble, Local democracy reporter | Eastern Daily Press | 15 January 2020 | www.edp24.co.uk ~~

Council chiefs have objected to proposals for two offshore windfarms on the Suffolk coast, claiming it will do “untold damage” to the area.

Scottish Power Renewables have submitted plans for two windfarms, which also includes a cable route overland through Thorpeness and Leiston, as well as three substations in Friston.

Suffolk County Council’s cabinet on Tuesday afternoon said it backed the principle of renewable energy projects, but could not support the scheme as it had not been developed thoroughly.

Among the issues raised were the visual impact on the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, impact on tourism, the severe effects on the village of Friston, doubts about the planting mitigation, noise and disturbance on communities and road networks.

Richard Rout, Conservative cabinet member for environment, said: “These proposals, if approved, would together provide enough clean electricity to power approximately 1.5million homes.

“There is also a positive economic impact associated with these proposals. The operation and maintenance facilities associated with the windfarms would provide tens of millions of pounds worth of investment in the region.

“However, as a local authority, our first consideration must always be our residents. Yes, these projects could bring crucial renewable energy and economic benefits but this must not be delivered at any cost.

“We must cherish our AONBs and safeguard them from the impacts of development as much as possible. As this report makes clear, we do not believe that these proposals from Scottish Power Renewables do that.

“We must continue to raise with government our very real worries around the lack of a co-ordinated approach to energy projects on and around the Suffolk coast.”

The objections have been welcomed by the council’s opposition Labour and Liberal Democrat, Green and Independent groups.

Penny Otton, Liberal Democrat, Green and Independent group leader, said: “I am really pleased to hear the comments from the cabinet members.

“There would be a significant impact on the current tourism industry, particularly in the area of the AONB.

“These are nationally and internationally recognised as part of the tourist industry of Suffolk and I think it would be an absolute disaster to put that in jeopardy.”

The cabinet welcomed the principle of the development but formally objected to the location of the substations and development around Friston.

The Planning Inspector will receive all representations on the issue by January 27, although is not expected to make a final recommendation to the secretary of state until the end of the year or early 2021.

Source:  Scottish Power Renewables will do "untold damage" to Suffolk coast, says council | Jason Noble, Local democracy reporter | Eastern Daily Press | 15 January 2020 | www.edp24.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: