LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Court ruling sparks controversy in Grain Belt Express Clean Line 

Credit:  Brooke Anderson | KQTV | Dec 18, 2019 | www.kq2.com ~~

A multi-billion dollar project has drawn a line of controversy through the state following the latest court ruling in the Grain Belt Express Clean Line.

On Tuesday, the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District rejected claims that the Public Service Commission had made a mistake in giving the go-ahead back in March to the construction of the Grain Belt Express Transmission line.

The $2.3 billion project would provide a high voltage wind power transmission that would take energy from wind farms in Kansas to eastern states, including Indiana and Illinois. However, part of the design has the line going through parts of southern Buchanan County, Clinton County and Caldwell County, affecting 570 local farmers and homeowners.

“It’s a highly controversial thing and so I know that there’s going to be a lot of people that, obviously, if you own that land you want to protect the integrity of that land, but unfortunately this is – currently this is the way the court has ruled,” Scott Burnham, Buchanan County commissioner, said.

The court ruling appeared to give the energy company the right to use eminent domain to purchase land from property owners even though it’s a private, for-profit company. Something Missouri Representative Sheila Solon (R-District 9) said is an overreach of government.

“We have generational farms that are being affected, we have homeowners. This is the biggest investment that you make in your life – that is your home and your farm,” Solon said. “To have high powered lines put through your property, that is reversed condemnation.”

Earlier this year, a bill blocking the Grain Belt Express was widely passed through the Missouri House of Representatives but failed in a Senate filibuster.

“I hope the legislature steps up. I hope they do the right thing,” Solon said. “They protect our citizens. This is one of our most basic rights as citizens.”

Solon said she has filed another bill (HB-1422) that is aimed at limiting the overreach of state, city and county governments in regards to eminent domain. The bill has been filed in the house but is currently not scheduled for a hearing.

“Basically what the bill says is that attorney fees and costs need to be paid to property owners whenever condemnation or eminent domain is used,” Solon said.

Burnham said he agreed that eminent domain was probably not the best way to move the project forward, but added that on the flip side the project will generate tax revenue and provide renewable energy for more states.

“Producing clean energy is better, obviously, that’s better for the environment long term and I know that is something that as we move forward we’re going to have to look for,” Burnham said.

In 2008, Missouri voted to have 11 percent of the state’s energy come from renewable sources – either produced or purchased. Burnham said currently the state is only at six percent.

Source:  Brooke Anderson | KQTV | Dec 18, 2019 | www.kq2.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon