[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Power line easement restricted to Colstrip plants  

Credit:  Billings Gazette | November 23, 2019 | billingsgazette.com ~~

I recently attended a wind power meeting about a new wind farm. The interesting part of this proposal was that the wind farm was going to have a tie in with the 500 KV lines that runs through our ranch. This caught my ear.

I was in on the original negotiations in 1980 with Montana Power. My mother, Mary McFarland White, disliked the power lines and what they stood for and never missed her chance to express a very negative opinion of Colstrip 3 and 4 and the twin power lines. When you talk about coal in this time frame, the Northern Plains Resource Council was involved. They pushed very hard against all coal related stuff. They made sure that the EIS tied Units 3 and 4 to the twin 500 KV lines and that the easement was very tight.

One of the reasons for this was because there was talk of more units at Colstrip and they did not want the power company to expand the easement to anything but 3 and 4 power. During this era, I became familiar with the EIS (over 800 pages) that was behind the easement.

In short, I believe the twin 500 KV lines were built to serve Colstrip coal power only. This means is any other use of the 500 KV lines is an expansion of the original easement. Another substation would also be an expansion of use. This means that the easement would have to be renegotiated with all landowners.

Mac White

Two Dot

Source:  Billings Gazette | November 23, 2019 | billingsgazette.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: