[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Supreme Court confirms planning permission cannot be bought  

Credit:  TLT LLP - Alexandra Holsgrove Jones and Katherine Evans | November 20 2019 | www.lexology.com ~~

The Supreme Court has confirmed that a proposed donation to a community fund equated to an attempt to buy planning permission.

The case of R (on the application of Wright) v Resilient Energy Severndale Ltd and Forest of Dean District Council concerned an application for a change of use of land at Severndale Farm from agriculture to the erection of a wind turbine. The application for planning permission included a promise that an annual donation would be made to a local community fund, based on 4% of the turnover from the operation of the wind turbine over 25 years.

In considering the planning application, the Council took the community fund donation into account. In fact, the planning permission imposed a condition in relation to the donation.

The decision was challenged by Mr Wright (a local resident) on the ground that the community fund donation was not a material consideration and should not have been taken into account during the planning process. The Council had acted unlawfully in doing so.

In agreeing with Mr Wright’s stance, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal. Lord Sales stated that ‘The community benefits to be provided by Resilient Severndale did not affect the use of the land. Instead, they were proffered as a general inducement to the Council to grant planning permission and constituted a method of seeking to buy the permission sought, in breach of the principle that planning permission cannot be bought or sold.’

The decision is unsurprising. The Supreme Court’s view is clear – any attempt to circumvent the principle that a decision to grant planning permission must not be influenced by monetary considerations that do not directly affect the use of the land to be developed, will be given short shrift.

Source:  TLT LLP - Alexandra Holsgrove Jones and Katherine Evans | November 20 2019 | www.lexology.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: