[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Follow the money  

Credit:  Watertown Public Opinion | www.thepublicopinion.com ~~

Since June 2019, Xcel Energy has asked Public Utility Commissions for rate hikes in several states to fund wind and transmission line projects: Colorado (Rush Creek Wind Project), Texas (Hale Wind Project), New Mexico (Sagamore Wind Project) and Minnesota (Courtenay ND Wind Farm). How many times have we been told wind energy will decrease rates?

Xcel Energy received 8.2 million dollars from South Dakota taxpayers in 2017 for wind energy. It was just reported in the Minneapolis Star Tribune Xcel’s CEO is compensated 26 million dollars a year! Xcel received so much money in production tax credits it hasn’t paid federal income tax from 2008-2015 and in 2018 made $1.4 billion but still got a $34 million rebate.

The next falsehood is that wind turbines are environmentally friendly. They are just the opposite, with each turbine using 900 tons of steel, 2500 tons of concrete, 45 tons of non-recyclable plastic and 900 pounds of rare earth elements plus the fossil fuels used to manufacture, deliver, erect and maintain them.

We are told wind developers and utility companies “make huge investments” but I only see taxpayers and rate payers making those investments. Maybe some reporter should investigate the collusion between our state government, public utility commission, wind developers, lobbyists and our Governor’s push for the Green New Deal.

Just start following the money.

Gregg Hubner

Avon, SD

Source:  Watertown Public Opinion | www.thepublicopinion.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: