[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

End of the road for Helmsdale mini windfarm plan  

Credit:  By Staff Reporter | The Northern Times | 13 November 2019 | www.northern-times.co.uk ~~

A last-ditch attempt by a Helmsdale landowner to erect five 125m high turbines on his land, has failed.

Highland Council in March rejected a planning application from Navidale Estate owner Phil Davidson to install the turbines on an elevated site 3290 metres to the north east of the Church of Scotland at West Helmsdale.

Among councillors who objected was East Sutherland and Edderton representative Richard Gale.

Mr Davidson appealed the decision but now Scottish Government reporter Keith Bray has turned that appeal down.

In background planning papers, the plan was said to have “divided” the community” with Helmsdale Community Council opting to remain neutral.

There were 151 objections to the turbines and 53 letters of support. Scottish Natural Heritage was against the plan.

The major fear was over the damage the development would cause to peatland – valued for the role it plays in carbon capture.

But those in favour cited the economic benefit with a commitment to pay more than £33,000 a year in community benefit.

Reporter Mr Bray visited the site on three occasions in July this year.

He found that the proposed turbines would impact on wild land area and have a significant “distracting and prominent” visual effect.

Regarding the peat issue, he states in his report: “I conclude that there would be significant effects on a Class 1 peatland habitat that cannot be mitigated within the site by siting and design.”

In his conclusion, he writes: “I do not consider that the scale of the benefits of the proposal, including a positive carbon balance, would be of greater importance than the negative environmental effects and the grounds of objection from Scottish Natural Heritage.”

It had been estimated that construction work would benefit the local economy by £1.16 million.

Source:  By Staff Reporter | The Northern Times | 13 November 2019 | www.northern-times.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: