[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Insults won’t taint Hopkinton wind ban  

Credit:  The Westerly Sun | www.thewesterlysun.com ~~

I write in response to Mr. Buford’s Oct. 14 letter titled “What’s the NIMBY plan for alternative energy in Hopkinton?”:

Who knew that the Hopkinton Conservation Commission was in the energy development business? Mr. Buford’s childish name calling – “NIMBY” – and his mischaracterization of the local residents group as “anti-renewable energy” is unbecoming at best.

Of course we are concerned about our backyards, and everyone else’s too. Responsible siting is the key to renewable energy. To date we have seen egregious siting attempts leading to legal action, all of which could have been avoided with responsible planning. When will these blatant attempts to encroach on private property rights stop in this town?

Recently, the Town Council voted 3-2 making wind turbines a non-permitted use in Hopkinton. The three “no” votes did so after listening to their constituents’ concerns and digesting innumerable scientific studies as well as firsthand accounts documenting the negative effects that turbines have on human health and wildlife. Perhaps that information went over Mr. Buford’s head. It is important to note that he did not provide a single piece of evidence to rebut our concerns, not one.

Wind turbines will not make a rapid transition from fossil fuel – land-based wind energy is not an efficient source of renewable energy; just ask the Rhode Island Department of Energy. They will not preserve our farms – in fact, not one Hopkinton farmer spoke in favor at the last Town Council meeting. I fail to see how the installation of wind turbines would equate into future funding for the Land Trust, nor would they generate significant non-residential tax revenue.

Finally Mr. Buford, I encourage you to read the data and firsthand accounts that were provided before you disregard factual citizen concerns. The Conservation Commission should stick to conservation and not presume themselves to be experts on any form of industrial development.

LouAnne McCormick

Hope Valley

Source:  The Westerly Sun | www.thewesterlysun.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.