[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind: Court rejects challenge to Calif. farm  

Credit:  Jeremy P. Jacobs, E&E News reporter | Published: Monday, September 23, 2019 | www.eenews.net ~~

Federal judges today dismissed a challenge to a large wind farm near San Diego, rejecting claims that agencies did not adequately weigh potential impacts on bald eagles and other birds.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Land Management conducted the legally required “hard look” at alternatives before approving the Tule Wind LLC project.

Tule Wind plans to build 85 wind turbines about 60 miles east of San Diego. The project was split into two phases: The first contains 65 turbines on federal land, and the second 20 turbines on tribal land.

It has spurred multiple lawsuits from the Protect Our Communities Foundation and local advocates contending that the turbines will damage the bald and golden eagle populations. Each challenge has been unsuccessful (Greenwire, June 8, 2016).

The San Francisco-based 9th Circuit today said that despite the challengers’ claims, the agencies had appropriately examined alternatives under the National Environmental Policy Act, including ultimately reducing the number of turbines permitted.

“What is troubling about this case is that it appears that, if and when the project proceeds, some eagles may die or have their nests impaired diminishing reproduction,” wrote Judge Ronald Gould for the unanimous three-judge panel.

“But the protections given by our environmental laws are not absolute,” he added.

The case centered on charges that the environmental impact statement and a supplemental document had not adequately analyzed alternatives that would mitigate the impacts on birds.

Judges rejected each claim, saying appropriate analysis was conducted by the agencies.

“We hold that the alternatives analysis was also sufficient as to BIA’s approval.”

The project originally called for 128 wind turbines. In the permitting process, the agencies required the company to nix more than 30 of those.

Source:  Jeremy P. Jacobs, E&E News reporter | Published: Monday, September 23, 2019 | www.eenews.net

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:

Tag: Wildlife


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: