[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Controversial wind farm extension is halted…for now  

Credit:  By Mike Addison | The Mail | 13th September | www.nwemail.co.uk ~~

Objectors who have battled a ‘noisy’ wind farm for 20 years have convinced councillors to temporarily halt plans to let it stay another decade.

Barrow Borough Council planners voted to defer an application by Cannock Wind Energy Limited to extend the life of the Askam and Ireleth wind farm.

Councillors want more independent evidence about the noise it makes.

The turbines have been branded the ‘worst in the country’ for complaints.

Marton resident Gillian Haythornthwaite told councillors it accounted for 152 of 206 complaints.

She blamed the site topography, changes in wind direction and how close it was built to homes.

Ms Haythornthwaite said it caused an ‘unbearable, horrendous, noise nuisance’ and that a noise reduction service installed by the operators had cut complaints but not stopped the noise.

Ireleth resident Les Nicholls told the planning committee: “It’s created a noise nuisance which has continued for 20 years. Despite this, no action has ever been taken by the council against the developer to my knowledge. When repeatedly questioned why the response has always been that the developer has got deep pockets and the council is skint.”

Mr Nicholls branded the wind farm ‘unproductive, uneconomical and loss-making,’ saying its value would ‘vastly increase’ if the application was agreed.

Mike Tracey, managing director for the applicants said they took over five years ago yet at no point had the wind farm been found to cause a statutory noise nuisance during its lifetime. Nor did Barrow council’s public protection officer object to the plan, he added.

Claims about its efficiency were ‘erroneous,’ said Mr Tracey, adding that it had delivered profits in-line with projections and still served a useful purpose.

He said the company took complaints seriously and had invested in noise management systems to provide ‘greater control and understanding’ of what was happening.

Cllr Mark Burley said: “You’ve had all this time to sort out the noise issues, why do you think you can sort it out now and obviously people aren’t happy.”

Cllr Bev Morgan said: “Twenty years of noise complaints is long enough.”

The committee voted to defer the application to a later date.

Source:  By Mike Addison | The Mail | 13th September | www.nwemail.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: