[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Iowa County Board of Supervisors rejects wind ordinance, will now rewrite draft  

Credit:  By Aaron Scheinblum | KCRG | Aug 23, 2019 | www.kcrg.com ~~

The Iowa County Board of Supervisors voted down a new ordinance that would regulate wind energy. This comes after months of debate over constructing wind turbines in the county.

The first reading of the ordinance failed Friday morning after three supervisors voted no, one voted in favor, and the chairman of the board continued to abstain his vote due to a conflict of interest.

Nearly 40 people spoke to the supervisors during the public hearing prior to the vote, and people both in favor of wind turbines and against them wanted to see the drafted ordinance thrown out and reconsidered.

In a small conference room across the street from the Iowa County Courthouse, there was a standing-room-only crowd for the Iowa County Board of Supervisors meeting. For more than an hour, supervisors heard from people giving their thoughts on the potential ordinance that would define the limits of wind farming in the county.

“I’m not against farmers farming and doing their business, but I am definitely not for the windmill project,” said Rick Rodgers, an Iowa County resident.

“My assessment after reading the information on your website is that all of the information is about maximizing profits from wind turbines,” said Paula Watkins of Iowa County. “Nothing is about protecting the people and wildlife from the negative effects of wind turbines.”

Iowa County’s Supervisors have already entered an agreement for more than 70 turbines- the ordinance that was drafted, as well as any future ordinance that could go into effect, would not apply to that project. It would, however, apply to an expansion of wind turbines in the county.

Even those in favor of the potential increase wanted to see the ordinance changed.

“This ordinance will allow those that already have windmills placed to proceed forward, but leaves the rest of us and possibly those who already have windmills, out of the future expansion because of the extended setbacks proposed in the ordinance,” said Dale Faas of Iowa County.

One of the reasons it could impact expansion is the restrictions on how far away turbines have to be from local roads, rivers, and non-participating homes, among other locations.

After being voted down, the board will now have to rewrite those regulations. Representatives from MidAmerican and Invenergy offered a warning if the ordinance proves restrictive, as representatives from both organizations spoke individually near the end of the public hearing.

“The 2,000-foot setback on the non-participating [residents], would really hinder future development in this county,” said Mark Zaccone, a contractor with Invenergy. Zaccone was interrupted after this comment due to an overwhelming number of people clapping. “I don’t know if that was the intent of that, but I wish you’d consider re-looking at that.”

“An example is Adair County, they were pretty open about this when they implemented a 2,000-foot setback, which is the greatest in Iowa that I’m aware of,” said Adam Jablonski with MidAmerican Energy. “They ultimately said it was like a moratorium until they got a comprehensive amendment in place.”

Members of the county’s board of supervisors said it is uncertain how fast they can create another draft to have another public hearing and vote on. It could be as soon as Friday, August 30, but that is still uncertain.

Source:  By Aaron Scheinblum | KCRG | Aug 23, 2019 | www.kcrg.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: