[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Editorial: Nebraska lawmakers should scrutinize the state’s conflict of interest laws  

Credit:  Editorial staff | Omaha World-Herald | www.omaha.com ~~

It’s uncertain what the final result will be from the legal wrangling over a proposed wind farm in the Nebraska Sand Hills. But one aspect of this issue ought to be certain: The Legislature next year should scrutinize and debate the proper way for state law to define conflicts of interest for public officials.

In the wind farm case, a Nebraska District Court judge in July temporarily blocked two Cherry County Board members from voting on an application for the project. This week the judge vacated the order, concluding that the board members’ family connections don’t constitute a conflict of interest as defined by current state law.

One board member’s wife sits on the board of directors for Cherry County Wind LLC, which connects its investor landowners with the project’s developer. This board member’s mother has leased land to Cherry County Wind.

The other board member in question has multiple family members, including brothers, a sister and her parents, connected to the project.

The judge may well be correct that as currently defined in state statutes, there are no conflicts of interest in the matter. But there’s a broader, long-term issue involved: Is current state law on conflicts of interest adequate in its clarity and restrictions on elected officials? Nebraska lawmakers should conduct a careful examination of that question next year, determining whether the law meets a responsible standard and if not, how it should be revised.

The state has a twofold duty on this issue. It should provide sound guidance to local government on what constitutes a conflict of interest. And it should provide reassurance to the public that proper safeguards are in place to ensure that the public interest, and not personal interests, decide government action.

Source:  Editorial staff | Omaha World-Herald | www.omaha.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: