[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Commissioners divided on Hancock Wind settlement  

Credit:  By Jennifer Osborn | The Ellsworth American | August 7, 2019 | www.ellsworthamerican.com ~~

ELLSWORTH – In a split vote Tuesday, the Hancock County Commissioners agreed to settle with Hancock Wind over the amount of community benefit funds the wind farm has been issuing to the county.

Commissioners Bill Clark and John Wombacher voted in favor of the agreement. Chairman Antonio Blasi voted against.

Community benefit funds, which are required by Maine law, are an annual payment the company makes to Hancock County for the public good based on the wind farm’s revenues.

Hancock Wind is in Township 16 and Township 22 (located east of Eastbrook and Osborn, respectively).

The board signed a community benefit agreement with Hancock Wind in 2014.

In 2017, Hancock Wind sent the full amount of the agreed upon payment, $207,738. However, that year the wind farm asked for a reimbursement of part of the funds, according to Unorganized Territory Supervisor Millard Billings. The county denied the request.

2018 was the first year the wind farm sent less money than expected, Billing said.

That annual payment in 2018 was $18,873 less than what Hancock County thought Hancock Wind owed, said County Administrator Scott Adkins.

The agreement between Hancock County and Hancock Wind that was approved this week was reached through mediation and states the parties agree to an annual community benefit fund payment of $188,853.

At issue is a disparity in the “rating generating capacity” of the wind farm, Adkins stated in a press release. The wind farm is producing less power than originally anticipated.

Hancock Wind issued lower community benefit payments to the county based on the farm’s lower megawatt rating generating capacity.

“The CBA [Community Benefit Agreement] annual payment was based on the ‘rating generating capacity’ of 17 turbines providing 56.1 megawatts,” Adkins said. “Before going on line, Hancock Wind got approval to lower its output to 51 megawatts and contended its CBA payment should have been lowered as well.”

Blasi declined to sign the agreement based on the lower generating capacity and said the county had a 50 percent chance of winning if it sued Hancock Wind for the community benefit payments originally agreed upon.

Clark disagreed.

“Why would we expect them to pay a certain level of CBA funds when their revenue is being reduced?” Clark asked.

Clark recalled the words of the case mediator, who is a retired Maine Supreme Court justice.

“‘I could look at both of your arguments and agree with both of you,’” Clark said, quoting the mediator.

“That’s not what our attorney said,” Blasi countered.

“What we got out of this is in writing the assurance they would never reduce our CBA payment but we would get an increase in CBA funds if their output increased,” Clark said.

The county initially attempted a compromise with the wind company, Adkins said.

But after informal discussions failed, the county filed a civil action with Hancock County Superior Court asking for a ruling on the meaning of ‘rating generating capacity’ as defined in the county’s contract with the wind farm.

The agreement, reached with assistance from the mediator, prevents Hancock Wind from lowering the amount it is presently paying and requires the company to increase its payment if its output increases.

The agreement also stipulates that Hancock Wind would disburse $7,500 annually to Hancock County communities, Adkins said. Those annual payments will continue for 18 years.

Source:  By Jennifer Osborn | The Ellsworth American | August 7, 2019 | www.ellsworthamerican.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.