[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

In conflict-of-interest case, judge rules 2 Cherry County Board members can’t vote on wind project  

Credit:  By Reece Ristau | BH News Service | www.nptelegraph.com ~~

A judge on Monday temporarily blocked two Cherry County Board members from voting on a planned wind energy project in the Sandhills, siding with opponents who argued those board members have a financial stake in the project’s outcome.

District Judge Mark Kozisek’s order temporarily prohibits board members Tanya Storer and Martin DeNaeyer from “hearing, discussing, considering, influencing or voting” on a conditional use permit for a 19-turbine wind farm planned west of Kilgore.

Preserve the Sandhills, the advocacy group that brought the lawsuit, filed the complaint on grounds that Storer and DeNaeyer have family members who would financially benefit from the project.

A public hearing and vote on the project was scheduled for Tuesday, but Monday’s injunction means the county board will lack the two-member majority required for the vote to occur.

It’s unclear what happens next. The issue will eventually return to the courts, but no hearing had been scheduled as of Monday evening. Jason Bruno, the Omaha attorney representing Preserve the Sandhills, said he’s not sure of the timeline.

Reached by phone, DeNaeyer and Storer declined to comment.

Bruno said the hearing lasted a little more than an hour, during which the judge’s line of questioning revolved around the legal definition of “immediate family” and what constitutes a conflict of interest.

State law defines immediate family as a child residing in the household; a spouse; or an individual claimed as a dependent for federal income tax purposes.

The hearing, which Bruno said was packed with attendees, was held in Holt County.

Source:  By Reece Ristau | BH News Service | www.nptelegraph.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: