LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Bureau County throws wrench and crane into wind turbine plan 

Credit:  Kim Shute | www.newstrib.com ~~

PRINCETON – The planned decommissioning of multiple wind turbines in Ohio and Walnut townships will have to be done the old-fashioned way.

Bureau County Board rejected an addendum to the 2006 agreement that would allow decomissioned turbines in Big Sky Wind Farm to be removed by the ‘tilt-and-drop’ method rather than by crane which is the method that has previously been used. It is planned to remove 17 of the 114 turbines; 97 of them will be replaced with Tier 1 General Electric turbines in a 9-12 month project.

Kendall and Katherine Guither appealed to the board to reject the proposal, citing fears that he newer method has greater potential to damage their property which houses a natural gas well.

Jerry Herling, who owns the construction company that will remove the turbines, told the board an agreement would be made with the Guithers that would take down the three turbines closest to their property via crane, but Katherine Guither argued that wasn’t good enough – the couple wanted all turbines affecting them to be removed by crane.

Board Member Mary Jane Marini asked the Guithers to clarify whether their request for the remaining turbines was rejected. The Guither’s said no one had given them an answer – Herling maintained he’d never been asked.

Despite Herling’s claims that tilt-and-drop is the industry standard that will allow for less damage to farm land, easier cleanup and has been his preferred method since 1987 with no reportable incidents, it wasn’t enough to garner the board’s support. The measure was defeated 12-10.

Down but not out

Immediately after voting down the request for addendum to the 2006 wind farm agreement, the board approved a new decomissioning and restoration plan for Big Sky addressing removal of turbines during future restorations. That agreement will allow turbines to be removed via tilt and drop.

Source:  Kim Shute | www.newstrib.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky