[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Tuning out infrasound dangers  

Credit:  Roy Harvey | Observer | Mar 24, 2019 | www.observertoday.com ~~

The Nuremberg Code (1947) is the universally accepted regulation on human experimentation. Each of the Code’s 10 stipulations apply to the ongoing experiment in Arkwright where residents are subject to infrasound. No one, not even those who signed contracts with the wind turbine industry, were informed of the potential dangers of infrasound.

Industrial wind turbines produce infrasound. This is a fully documented fact. It is produced by the gigantic blades passing the pole. Up wind, that is. In a roughly 180-degree arc. The taller the pole, the greater the swath of infrasound. Audible sound is the ‘whoosh’ noise our neighbors in Arkwright constantly hear and which can be a terrible nuisance – but it is the sound we can’t hear that has the well-known negative health effects on living organisms, including ourselves.

Each organ in our body has its own acoustic resonance in the infrasonic range, under 20 hertz. The human eye resonates at 18 hertz, just below the threshold of human hearing. Disturbances in the eye as well as the ear caused by infrasound are well documented. It’s widely known that specific infrasound resonances directed at the brain can produce fear, anxiety, anger and so on.

Infrasound has been recognized and used as a weapon by the U.S. military. It was found to produce a wide range of ill effects: sleep deprivation to the point of torture, harm to the lungs and heart. Infrasound, however, was unreliable as a weapon and was abandoned. It didn’t have the same ill effects on everyone. The same appears to be the case with infrasound produced by industrial wind turbines. Some individuals are more affected than others.

Many of the people in Arkwright as well as their animals are suffering from infrasound. They exhibit the classic symptoms extensively documented in the CIA/DIA declassified documents on infrasound, as well as contemporary academic studies: sleep deprivation, nausea, irritability, ear whistling, headache, heart irregularities, fatigue, depression, suicidal thoughts.

The wind industry ignores the infrasound generated by its turbines, focusing only on audible sound. New York state goes along with this deception, overlooking the life-threatening affects of infrasound when its dangers are so extensively documented. The state’s action (or inaction) is tantamount to condoning the use of residents as guinea pigs, people deprived of informed consent.

Continued acceptance, installation and operation of the giant infrasound turbines constitutes a crime against humanity unless informed consent is obtained specifically regarding a full explanation of infrasound.

While all 10 points of the code are relevant to the apparently uncontrolled Arkwright experiment, this is point one:

“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent: should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and their effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.”

Roy Harvey is a Mayville resident.

Source:  Roy Harvey | Observer | Mar 24, 2019 | www.observertoday.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: