| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
MP calls for debate to avoid ‘major environmental impact’ of offshore windfarm projects
Credit: Geraldine Scott | Eastern Daily Press | 07 March, 2019 | www.edp24.co.uk ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
A parliamentary debate on offshore windfarms – which was cancelled so a Norfolk MP could attend a public meeting on the issue – has been rescheduled.
Mid Norfolk MP George Freeman had secured an end of day adjournment debate last month over where substations are built to serve new offshore wind farms in Norfolk, amid two major wind farm schemes off the county’s coast.
But he cancelled the debate at the last minute to rush back to Norwich to ensure he could take part into a planning enquiry on one of the projects.
Now it has been rescheduled for Monday.
Three of the biggest wind farms in the world are planned off the Norfolk coast.
The companies behind them say they will provide enough energy to power more than four million homes – the equivalent of five Sizewell nuclear power stations.
But the work to put in cables and substations will affect more than 200 landowners – and Conservative Mr Freeman has criticised the public engagement and has said there is a “total lack of any proper strategic plan for offshore wind energy in the east”.
Mr Freeman said he was supportive of the projects in principle but said rather than the idea that each wind farm will cable to its own substation inland, the National Grid and Crown Estate should be proactively looking to construct an offshore ring main that can pool the electricity generated before bringing it onshore via a main landfall station.
He said: “Instead of a proper strategic connection plan, we’ve got a chaotic free for all of major cables and substations coming, with major environmental impact.”
Company Vattenfall wants to build two wind farms, Vanguard and Boreas, 50km east of the coast at Happisburgh, while the wind farm, Hornsea Three, will be built 120km north of the Norfolk coast by Danish energy firm Orsted.
Cables from Hornsea Three would come ashore at Weybourne, while cables from Vattenfall’s two wind farms would reach Norfolk at Happisburgh.
Both would then need trenches up to 60 kilometres long to be dug across the Norfolk countryside to connect them to the National Grid. The Vattenfall development would see a substation at Nection, while Orsted’s scheme would require one at Swardeston.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=92026 ]
