[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Commissioners want money upfront from Wind Energy Project  

Credit:  Michael Harrington, Staff Reporter | Sandusky Register | 2/26/2019 | www.sanduskyregister.com ~~

BELLEVUE – A packed room gave the Erie County commissioners a standing ovation Tuesday when they voted to deny the payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) for a wind farm project.

The commissioners hosted a public hearing at Bellevue Elementary School with the trustees of Groton and Oxford townships to hear from the public on the Emerson Creek Wind Project.

The project, which is developed by Apex Clean Energy, would see the construction of up to 71 wind turbines in Erie and Huron counties if approved by the Ohio Power Siting Board.

Apex gave a presentation on what it believed would be the benefits of the project and pointed out that the county only had power over how the money would be received. The approval for the project is in the hands of the Ohio Power Siting Board.

Hundreds of people turned out to the Bellevue Elementary School Tuesday for an Erie County Commissioner’s public hearing on the PILOT for the Emerson Creek Wind Project. – Register photos/MICHAEL HARRINGTON

Hundreds of people filled the cafeteria many of whom, like Oxford Township resident Krista Beck, wore yellow shirts signifying their disapproval. Beck believes wind energy is too ineffective and the life span too short.

“They’re not economic and they’re not going to last,” Beck said. “Wind is not viable, it’s not reliable and it’s not right for our community.”

Others aired concerns on possible problems of putting impermeable concrete foundation near groundwater in Bellevue. Another complaint was the violation of land rights and the aesthetics of turbines.

“You’re pushing all these windmills to the corners of the counties so the people in the county seats don’t have to deal with it,” said Mike Wallace, of Oxford Township. “When we built our homes and bought our homes it wasn’t to look at windmills.”

One of the few people to speak in support of the project was Bill Dillion, of Milan, who spoke about the need to explore alternative energy and cut down emissions.

“There’s a point when we have to start doing better with our environment. There are so many things that are changing. I tried to find nonpartisan information and its tough to do because the people who stand to lose the most are fossil fuel companies,” Dillion said.

But the only issue the commissioners could vote on was whether to accept the payment in lieu of taxes or to deny it and receive property taxes from the turbines if the project is approved by the siting board.

“It almost seems better to not do the PILOT … I’m not really sure where the advantage is to it,” commissioner Pat Shenigo said.

Commissioner Matt Old agreed that he didn’t see the advantage to the payment progam and said it would be better to receive the $1.3 million upfront through real estate tax.

“I think I’d prefer to have my money upfront if the project really is a go and we don’t have a say in it … we just have a say in how we want the money and my opinion is we want the money upfront,” Old said.

Steve Shoffner agreed with his fellow commissioners and said his perspective going into this was figuring out what the residents wanted for themselves.

“My whole perspective coming into this was how do we protect you, how do we protect the county,” Shoffner said. “I get there could be some folks who own a lot of property and they might have a big interest in it, but what do we do about the individual property owners.”

The commissioners had 30 days from the submission of the payment in lieu of taxes, otherwise known as the PILOT, but decide vote at the public hearing with all three voting against it. But Emerson Creek’s project developer Sarah Moser said the project will move forward without the PILOT.

“I’m glad they felt they had enough information to make their decisions tonight. It means we did our job and I hope it works out,” Moser said. “It wasn’t about the project it was about the PILOT and it was the county’s decisions. We’ll continue to go forward with the project and do the best we can.”

Source:  Michael Harrington, Staff Reporter | Sandusky Register | 2/26/2019 | www.sanduskyregister.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:

Tag: Photos


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: