[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

DeWitt wind farm called ‘wrong project at the wrong place’  

Credit:  Kevin Barlow | The Pantagraph | February 19, 2019 | www.pantagraph.com ~~

CLINTON – Opponents of a proposed DeWitt County wind farm detailed at a hearing Tuesday ways they say the turbines would hurt the quality of life in the area.

Objectors to the $300 million Tradewind Energy Alta Farms II project had their chance to testify before the DeWitt County Zoning Board of Appeals in the fourth of seven planned meetings at Clinton High School. About 200 people attended the meeting.

They said the project would lower property values, endanger wildlife, produce flicking shadows and noise that would disturb nonparticipating landowners in the footprint of the project and even interfere with the National Weather Service’s Doppler radar.

“Alta Farms II is the wrong project at the wrong place,” said Donald Waddell, a 31-year resident of DeWitt County. “This wind energy project would put lives at risk.”

The ZBA is expected to vote on making a recommendation on Lenexa, Kan.-based Tradewind Energy’s special-use permit to the DeWitt County Board later this week. ZBA meetings are scheduled to begin at 5 p.m. Wednesday, Thursday and Friday nights if necessary.

The County Board is expected to consider the project next month.

In a series of three meetings two weeks ago, Tradewind Energy officials presented an in-depth overview of the project, which includes 67 individual wind turbines, each up to 591 feet tall, spreading over 12,202 acres in Barnett, Wapella and Clintonia townships.

“As was clearly demonstrated during the nearly 15 hours over three nights of hearings last week, the application is complete, fully meets the requirements of the DeWitt County Zoning Code, and would be an asset to the community,” said Tom Swierczewski, development director for Tradewind Energy.

But Tuesday night, opponents of the project voiced their concerns to the seven-member board. Waddell, who has a degree in physics, said the turbines would present several issues, especially for the weather service radar in Lincoln.

“It’s not about masking something that isn’t there, it’s about masking from view something that is there,” he said. “Interference caused by the wind farm will hinder NWS forecasters in assessing severe weather and making timely warning decisions. Tornado warnings could be delayed or missed.”

Officials with the NWS are not allowed to attend wind farm hearings or lobby for or against them, he said.

Also testifying was Kurt Kielisch, the president of Forensic Appraisal Group based in Neenah, Wis., who testified that property values of nearby properties would be impacted by the wind farm.

“One of the things you look at is what the public is saying,” he said. “They are concerned with health issues, hazards, the number of accidents and failures due to ice throw, blade throw due to weakening, the danger to planes and crop dusters and the nuisance of flicker,” he said. “Properties are hard to sell in areas where wind farms have been built.”

Kielisch referenced the Twin Groves Wind Farm in McLean County.

“There was an 8.5 percent loss in the value of the property in 38 sales near the wind farm.”

Kielisch said of the 38 properties sold, eight were within the perimeter of the wind farm.

But on cross-examination by Tradewind Energy attorney Jim Griffin, Kielisch admitted that he did not review the zoning codes for McLean County or the special-use permit application from Tradewind Energy and wasn’t familiar with the specifics of the project.

The testimony will resume at 5 p.m. Wednesday at the high school.

Source:  Kevin Barlow | The Pantagraph | February 19, 2019 | www.pantagraph.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.