[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Concerned Citizens of Branch County want recusal, resignations or non-zoning standards  

Credit:  Don Reid | The Daily Reporter | Dec 17, 2018 | www.thedailyreporter.com ~~

UNION TOWNSHIP – After losing a vote to bring zoning to Union Township, Concerned Citizens of Branch County Coalition took another track last week to establish wind turbine regulations in the township.

Pam Reed called for Supervisor Ralph Strong and Trustee Bryan Washburn to recuse themselves from any further participation in wind turbine related issues threatening to file ethics complaints if they do.

Marilyn Johnson, a retired teacher that was recently appointed by the County Commission to the County Planning Commission, called for their resignation due to a conflict of interest.

Reed said, reading from a prepared statement, the public records show “the families of Mr. Strong and Mr. Washburn entered into their lease agreements with DTE. DTE has paid out approximately $33,000 to their families combined.”

DTE has discussed possible restrictions they would agree to put in place for construction of proposed wind turbines in the township.

In her statement Reed argued that these are not enforceable as would be zoning.

Kelly Barnes asked the board to tell the public what steps it would take to protect residents from health, noise, and related issues that some reports have said could derive from wind turbines.

“Think about some sort of restrictions to keep those things miles away from people,” she said.

Strong said he does not react to public comment, ‘but I’ll give you an answer as a courtesy. I understand it’s going to be on a countywide basis for zoning. We put it on the ballot and the voters voted it down, not to have a planning commission.”

“There must be some protection you can have against pig farms, nuclear, hazardous waste, cell towers to protect residents,” Barnes said. “People do need to be protected.”

Gary Chester said everything the coalition has presented asks “how are we going to protect the siting for the health, safety and well being of the community?”

“Protection can be by non-zoning ordinances to establish setbacks. That would calm a lot of the concerns,” Chester added.

Chester asked for “legally effective, reasonable standards, so people can be protected in their property and their homes through a township ordinance.”

Source:  Don Reid | The Daily Reporter | Dec 17, 2018 | www.thedailyreporter.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.