[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Judge delays ruling on Deuel landowners lawsuit  

Credit:  By The Public Opinion News Staff | www.thepublicopinion.com ~~

CLEAR LAKE – Judge Dawn Elshere took under advisement Thursday morning a case where 14 landowners sued the Deuel County Board of Adjustment regarding its decision to permit a wind energy project.

The case was heard in a Third Judicial Circuit courtroom in Clear Lake.

The lawsuit charges that two members of the adjustment board had signed wind tower lease agreements with a wind energy company before voting to approve the project. The five-member board voted unanimously on Jan. 22, 2018, to permit applications from project sponsor Invenergy.

In addition to the accusation of conflict of interest, the landowners say the board failed to properly consider the their objections and to issue written findings verifying that the turbines were placed in accordance with zoning ordinances.

The plaintiffs also noted that one board member had said at a previous meeting that additional wind tower setbacks would make it impossible to place towers on his father’s property.

Deuel County State’s Attorney John Knight had previously recused himself because of conflicts of interest, the lawsuit said, but advised the board during the Jan. 22 meeting.

In June of 2017, Deuel County had adopted stricter rules for wind development in response to heavy public input about two projects named Deuel Harvest Wind Energy. The first phase would place 130 turbines on private land, supposedly generating enough electricity to power 100,000 homes. If completed, it would be one of the largest wind projects in state history.

Elshere’s ruling allows her to consider the evidence and arguments and subsequently issue a ruling. There is no response unless the judge says one side can respond to the other party’s motion. There is no time frame for a ruling. Defendants won’t be brought back to court. The order or ruling will be sent to the lawyers.

Source:  By The Public Opinion News Staff | www.thepublicopinion.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: