[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Concerns remain but no official council objection over revised £2bn offshore Angus windfarm  

Credit:  By Graham Brown | The Courier | December 11 2018 | www.thecourier.co.uk ~~

Angus Council has stepped back from a formal objection to changes for a £2 billion offshore wind farm which will see turbines rise to almost 300 metres off the county’s coast.

The Inch Cape Offshore Limited (ICOL) scheme is one of three multi-billion pound turbine arrays proposed for the outer Firths of the Tay and Forth in a zone stretching from around ten miles into the North Sea.

Alterations to the previously consented scheme will see the number of turbines drop from 110 to 72, but their hub height will rise from 129 metres to more than 160 metres above LAT (lowest astronomical tide), with maximum turbine heights rising from 172m to 250m, or 820 feet.

The local authority has said concerns remain over the array’s “significant impacts” on the historic Bell Rock lighthouse, 11 miles off the coast of Arbroath, as well as the cumulative effect of the Neart Na Gaoithe and Seagreen windfarms also in the pipeline.

In a fresh consultee response over the Inch Cape changes, council planning leader Kate Cowey has called for a “co-ordinated approach” which would avoid larger turbines being stacked in the foreground of the view visible from Angus.

It states: “Whilst the development proposes to reduce the overall number of turbines the respective increase in tip height and rotor diameter will invariably make the individual turbines more visible.

“The night time viewpoints confirm that the lighting would be viewed in close association and at a greater height to the light on the Bell Rock lighthouse.

“Further consideration requires to be given to this matter in order to ensure an appropriate technical solution is identified and if this is the case the associated effects would be unlikely to be unacceptable.”

The response adds: “We would stress that a key cumulative consideration is the relative height and design of the three different off-shore wind farm developments.

“A level of consistency is important to prevent the collective view becoming visually inconsistent or distorting seascape perspective by having turbines of noticeably different sizes within the same view.

“The proposal for Inch Cape potentially proposes the use of 291m high turbines. This scale of turbine would be greater in height than the potential 208m high turbines proposed by Neart Na Gaoithe.

“This would lead to a situation whereby larger turbines are located in the foreground with smaller turbines in the background.

“Although this proposal is not unacceptable in its own right, in order to avoid a confusing and poorly harmonised visual image a co-ordinated approach to the finalised height of each development should be considered.”

The Inch Cape development recently took a significant step forward when ICOL said it had entered into agreement with three companies to deliver the export cable infrastructure needed to connect the array to the power grid.

Up to 1,900 full-time equivalent jobs are expected to be created during the three-year construction period, providing a projected £240 million per annum boost to the economy.

Source:  By Graham Brown | The Courier | December 11 2018 | www.thecourier.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: