[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Objection to be lodged by Moray Council over controversial Speyside windfarm  

Credit:  By David Walker | The Press and Journal | November 13, 2018 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

Government officials have been told they must not allow the expansion of a Speyside windfarm for fear it would have a catastrophic impact upon some of Moray’s finest landscapes.

The authority’s planning officers have objected to proposals that would see seven new turbines, each 500 feet tall, erected to the east of Paul’s Hill.

A windfarm has been in operation on the Ballindalloch site since 2006, with 28 turbines generating energy for Fred Olson Renewables.

And the energy giant has now lodged plans with the Scottish Government for Paul’s Hill II, with the extension to be sited on the hills of Carn-na-Dubh-chlais, west of Knockando.

Due to the size of the development, the proposals were submitted directly to the Scottish Government, with Moray Council invited to put forward a consultation response to ministers.

The Ministry of Defence has already objected to the plan as it believes the turbines could disrupt military radar at Scotland’s most vital airbase.

RAF Lossiemouth is the UK’s first line of defence against air incursion by foreign powers – and the Russians in particular – and is being readied to become home to a new wing of P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft.

Now Moray Council planning officials have recommended to elected members on the planning committee that they lodge a second official objection.

They believe the expansion will cause unacceptable landscape and visual impacts, given the position and height of the proposed turbines.

Neal McPherson, principal planning officer at the council, said: “While national policy provides support for renewable energy the proposal is not considered to be in full accordance with the local development plan policy and guidance.”

“The proposed turbines will encroach visually upon the more complex lower Spey Valley to the south and to the more settled Upper Knockando area to the east and north-east.”

Roy’s Hill – a local landmark – would also be detrimentally affected, according to planners, as the turbines would “diminish its distinctiveness” in the landscape.

Despite the concerns raised by planners and the MoD, fellow consultees Historic Environment Scotland and Mountaineering Scotland have offered no challenges to the proposals.

Moray Council’s planning committee will be expected to make a decision about whether to object today, with the Scottish Government then having the final say on whether the plans will go ahead.

Fred Olson Renewables are also in the early stages of planning for up to 29 turbines, each more than 700ft tall, as part of the Rothes III development, north of Archiestown.

Speyside Glenlivet councillor Derek Ross who campaigned successfully against the Brown Muir wind farm near Rothes fully endorsed the objection.

He said: “We are at saturation point with wind farms and this one is going to affect businesses depending on the wild landscapes up here.

“This one is close to encroaching onto Spey Valley which is a jewel in the crown for Moray and another key thing is that it encroaches Roys Hill which is another local landmark.

“Coating the hills in windfarms is suicide for tourism, people come here for the landscapes and these turbines will become some of the largest in Scotland.

“We’ve got enough already and they are accumulating so much.”

Source:  By David Walker | The Press and Journal | November 13, 2018 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: