[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Motion to intervene on turbine appeal denied  

Credit:  By Brad Cole | The Falmouth Enterprise | November 9, 2018 | www.capenews.net ~~

The Massachusetts Appeals Court rejected a motion to intervene in the court order to shut down Falmouth’s two wind turbines as a nuisance, upholding Barnstable Superior Court Judge Cornelius J. Moriarty II’s decision.

“We see no reason to disturb the judge’s ruling,” Associate Justices Peter J. Rubin, Gabrielle R. Wolohojian, and Amy L. Blake wrote in their decision, noting the history of the litigation.

“Here, [Judge Moriarty] properly considered that intervention would delay and complicate the final resolution that was achieved between the original parties, and would therefore prejudice those parties,” the justices wrote. “Indeed, the original parties considered the matter to be concluded. Moreover, reopening the case would cause the original parties to incur additional legal expenses.”

Filed by The Green Center Inc. of Hatchville and 12 Falmouth residents, the motion requested Judge Moriarty to reconsider his 2017 decision that upheld a Falmouth Zoning Board of Appeals decision deeming the turbines a nuisance and ordered the turbines shut down. Through a motion to intervene, The Green Center sought to replace that order with a “more equitable remedy for all parties.”

Judge Moriarty denied the request.

“The judge denied the motion concluding that the interveners could not likely establish standing, and that the motion was untimely,” the appeals court judges wrote. “We affirm.”

The judges noted the interveners had 60 days after the judgment was entered on June 21, 2017, to appeal the decision. The motion to intervene was not filed until November 15, 2017. In addition, their decision notes The Green Center failed to establish a compelling interest in filing the motion to intervene.

“As an organization, The Green Center has not offered sufficient evidence to support the assertion that its interest in reducing environmental contamination will in fact be harmed by the judgment,” the judges wrote.

Falmouth residents listed on the motion to intervene are George M. Woodwell, Ronald D. Zweig, Christina C. Rawley, Earle A. Barnhart (the principal officer of The Green Center), John Carlton-Foss, Rhona N. Carlton, James Churchill, Hilde Maingay, Pamela D. Pelletreau, Robert H. Pelletreau Jr., Allison B. White and Katharine R. Woodwell.

Although the appeal was denied, The Green Center can petition the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court for further review.

Source:  By Brad Cole | The Falmouth Enterprise | November 9, 2018 | www.capenews.net

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.