LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Campaign Countdown: Vermont’s energy future 

Both say wind isn't expanding in Vermont. Hallquist says wind power has to be used, but won't be generated in Vermont because it's cheaper elsewhere. "Now I'm not necessarily about putting wind on ridgelines because we can get that wind from the midwest at a significantly lower price than in Vermont," she said. She says Vermonters will choose wind if they want it. "We'll let Vermonters decide that. "I do -- that communities, all the communities within a viewshed should make the decision. I suspect that Vermonters aren't going to support additional wind turbines in Vermont." Scott is more firmly opposed. Reporter Neal Goswami: What is a non-starter for you in terms of renewable energy sources? Gov. Phil Scott: Wind generation, large-scale wind generation on our ridgelines. It's something that I've opposed for the last few years."

Credit:  By Neal Goswami | WCAX | Oct 17, 2018 | www.wcax.com ~~

Vermont’s energy future is a key issue, and one that the candidates for governor are weighing in on.

In her previous gig as a utility executive, Democrat Christine Hallquist helped write a plan that she says the state should adopt. “It’s called the Solar Pathways Plan. I would make that the comprehensive energy plan. That is my energy plan,” Hallquist said.

Republican Gov. Phil Scott says his policy is focused on expanding solar and hydro from north of the border. “I believe that the future is more in solar, and again, hydro in some capacities. We also utilize biomass here in the state. So a combination of a lot of different efforts, specifically with Canada being a large provider of hydro,” Scott said.

Both say wind isn’t expanding in Vermont. Hallquist says wind power has to be used, but won’t be generated in Vermont because it’s cheaper elsewhere. “Now I’m not necessarily about putting wind on ridgelines because we can get that wind from the midwest at a significantly lower price than in Vermont,” she said. She says Vermonters will choose wind if they want it. “We’ll let Vermonters decide that. “I do – that communities, all the communities within a viewshed should make the decision. I suspect that Vermonters aren’t going to support additional wind turbines in Vermont.”

Scott is more firmly opposed.

Reporter Neal Goswami: What is a non-starter for you in terms of renewable energy sources?
Gov. Phil Scott: Wind generation, large-scale wind generation on our ridgelines. It’s something that I’ve opposed for the last few years.”

Scott says power storage is the future. He wants to support companies like Vermont-based Dynapower that are working on it. “Some of the future is going to be dependent on new technology. When I talk about that I talk about large-scale energy storage, battery storage, so that renewables make sense,” he said.

Adding more electric vehicles is also a priority for Scott. “Electric vehicles is what the future is. It’s coming,” he said.

While Scott says he firmly opposes a carbon tax, Hallquist isn’t committing to it, or rejecting it. She does say it’s the most effective way to mitigate carbon emissions. “The price on carbon deserves a deep dive. I certainly wouldn’t take a position on it now. Any policy we need to put in place, we’re gonna put it through that filter of how it impacts those people on the lowest economic ladder. We can’t negatively impact people who are struggling today,” she said.

Source:  By Neal Goswami | WCAX | Oct 17, 2018 | www.wcax.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky