[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Report: Moving disputed Falmouth turbine would cost $3M 

Credit:  Christine Legere | Cape Cod Times | Oct 16, 2018 | www.capecodtimes.com ~~

FALMOUTH – One of the two wind turbines under a court order never to operate at their current spot may spin again on the wastewater treatment plant property, a little less than a half mile north from where it now stands.

Accomplishing the move, however, would cost the town just over $3 million and isn’t likely to appease critics of the turbine’s current location.

Weston and Sampson engineers were hired by selectmen to consider the possibility of relocating Wind II on the 329-acre plant property, while making it a priority to keep any new location as far away as possible from homeowners in the area.

In its report, released Monday just prior to the selectmen’s meeting, the company said a spot in the northeast corner of the property might fit the bill. Moving the massive 400-foot turbine that half mile would require putting in about 1,200 feet of road, some underground utility cable, and construction of a new foundation, as well as initial dismantlement and subsequent reassembly of the turbine.

A minimum of three acres would have to be cleared on the target site, the report says. Due to the confirmed presence of the eastern box turtle, work on relocation may have to be limited to between Nov. 1 and April 15 – the turtle’s inactive season. An alternative would be to set up “turtle-excluding” fencing around the target area.

The cost for the relocation project was estimated at just over $3 million initially but the turbine would ultimately bring in some money to the town.

Barry Funfar, an abutter to the turbines’ current location, was surprised to hear relocation on the wastewater treatment plant property was even being considered, based on the long and expensive history of litigation the turbine’s current location had prompted.

The report states the closest resident to the location under consideration was about 2,100 feet.

“That’s not far enough,” said Funfar, who said he had suffered several health effects from the operation of the turbines. “It would bother me at that distance. I certainly hope we don’t end up with another round of litigation.”

The two town-owned wind turbines at the treatment plant proved to be a source of bitter debate since the day they started spinning. Wind I went online in 2010, but has not operated since September 2015, when the Zoning Board of Appeals denied it a special permit.

Wind II started operating in 2012 and shut down when Barnstable Superior Court Judge Cornelius Moriarty issued a decision in 2017 that found its operation was a nuisance.

The Massachusetts Appeals Court determined in 2015 that Wind I needed a special permit to operate. The Zoning Board then denied that permit request and Wind I has not spun since.

Wind II was not part of the suit.

While Wind II also lacks the special permit, Town Counsel Frank Duffy said there was no similar successful challenge that forced it to undergo the special permit process.

The Weston and Sampson report points out the town’s wind energy bylaw, approved in 2013, does not allow for wind turbine projects larger than 250 kilowatts. At 1.65 megawatts, Wind II produces six times that amount of energy, but it also predates enactment of the bylaw, the engineering report says. The wind energy bylaw provides that any wind system lawfully in existence as of its 2013 enactment could be considered conforming and may apply for a special permit under the bylaw to alter, relocate or otherwise make improvements.

Some in town don’t agree Wind II has ever been categorized as lawfully in existence, however.

In the report, the engineers looked at the possibility of converting Wind I to a wireless communication tower. Another option would be to store it and use it for parts, as needed, for Wind II.

Selectmen planned to listen to the engineering report on Monday, but called the presentation simply a first step in resolving the future of the turbines.

Source:  Christine Legere | Cape Cod Times | Oct 16, 2018 | www.capecodtimes.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon